STUPIDVIPGUY

joined 1 year ago
[–] STUPIDVIPGUY@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 year ago

that's one way to get a leg up

[–] STUPIDVIPGUY@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

he is an agent of capital principle

[–] STUPIDVIPGUY@sopuli.xyz 29 points 1 year ago (6 children)
[–] STUPIDVIPGUY@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It has been statistically proven that white women get easier sentences than men of any race. Her age also probably played in to that.

[–] STUPIDVIPGUY@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

yeah makes sense

[–] STUPIDVIPGUY@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I understand it's easier for you just to use a card, so you don't think it's necessary, but it's probably a good idea to carry a few euros at least

[–] STUPIDVIPGUY@sopuli.xyz 50 points 1 year ago (13 children)

ok but why did you watch 3 seasons of a show you didn't enjoy

[–] STUPIDVIPGUY@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Of course you can't predict the future, and neither can motorists. What you can do is ride at a speed reasonably slow enough that you can react to people, and you can ride on the side of the pathway further from the doorways.

And like I said already, a bike on person accident at slow speed is favorable to risking my own life or life-changing injury by riding in the street.

If you're trying to change my mind, stop trying. For anyone reading this, petition your local government to build safe bike lanes with solid barriers and we won't have to have this argument.

[–] STUPIDVIPGUY@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

so the only case these apply are when the cyclist isn't paying attention to their surroundings... which is the real reason it's dangerous, and when you eliminate that, I would rather have bikes passing next to people than cars passing next to bikes, because the latter is actually deadly when someone does make a mistake

[–] STUPIDVIPGUY@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago

What that republican senator is doing is immature but military readiness isn't really that important considering our massive lead over every other country in the world, not to mention our extensive network of allies. Nobody is invading the USA.

Military spending needs to be cut by at least 25% and then maybe we'd have some money to spend on actually relevant concerns

But yes, it shows the partisan and regressive attitudes of the current GOP. It's sad to see that the OC seems to care about making progress on important issues like public welfare only to get brainwashed into thinking it's the left's fault for being inefficient. There is some truth to that but the reason our advocates of social progress can't get anything done is specifically because of the GOP's zero-sum stonewalling.

[–] STUPIDVIPGUY@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Baseless statement, elaborate

It's not more dangerous for pedestrians because I am aware and respectful of them.

So tell me exactly how it's more dangerous for me to be on a further-removed pathway, protected by a curb and other objects like light posts.

[–] STUPIDVIPGUY@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

Honestly a music platform is one of the only places I would actually welcome targeted ads. Where it can analyze my taste and suggest new music accordingly. But instead they just promote the highest bidder which is always lame pop music.

view more: next ›