Redredme

joined 1 year ago
[–] Redredme@lemmy.world -3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

You indeed need prime for this.

Which is the best deal you can get for free fast delivery, unlimited photo storage, several free monthly pc games, free access to amazons cloud gaming platform luna to play anywhere on anything and prime video. And some other shit i don't remember.

Its not a loophole. Its a very clear transaction. You give them money and some data, you get this pile of stuff which costs more (money and data) if you get it somewhere else.

And yes, its a lock in into the Amazon ecosystem. We all know that's the reason amazon does this. Which isn't t worse or better then the Google, Apple or MS ecosystem which you're already on since you're posting here. It is much cheaper though.

SSDD.

[–] Redredme@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago (6 children)

What stuff?

Please show us something, anything.

Was he weird? Fuck yes. Was he a pedo: acquitted on all accounts. So hell no.

[–] Redredme@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago

This is F1, they are hybrid, have been for years.

[–] Redredme@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Funny to see that after all this time we're back to V1's and V2's i(skander) but this time with gps. (or glonass)

[–] Redredme@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Ukraine had lots of military industry after the fall of the Soviet union. From ships to missiles to helicopters to big ass planes.

It's just that they pissed most of it away.

[–] Redredme@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

I disabled ipv6 long ago and never moved. Not even blinked.

[–] Redredme@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You're clearly not a child of the 80s. It's literally in the picture. The stack of paper.

Back then, monitors where shite and small. Diskdrives where slow. So debugging was mostly done on paper (print it, read it, mark the lines with errors) because you could read it better and it was easier to go back a page or two on paper because of shitty slow Diskdrives. It was the time when 640 kb was an insane amount of memory.

[–] Redredme@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Back in those days the answer on all three questions was: yes.

[–] Redredme@lemmy.world 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Redredme@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Ideal is not the same, by any means, as PayPal. Read up.

With ideal you loose your money. Ideal is made from the pov of the bank and the shop selling you stuff. Its almost impossible to claim your money back without the sellers consent.

Tikkie is not the same as PayPal since tikkie only works with EU banks. (and quite possibly at this moment only NL banks) PayPal does not need a bank account. Its also not really a wrapper around ideal but thats another discussion. And mostly a semantic one so lets not go there.

Effe wat meer moeite doen en de kleine lettertjes lezen medenedelander :)

[–] Redredme@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There is no discussion about audio quality. Zero. Zilch. Nada. Nothing. You can talk about the format, cds being less nice to handle with that awkward plastic box which always breaks. But not about the audio quality. Its measurable.

Yes, perfectly pressed vinyl can sound fantastic on very hq hifi. But it will crack. It will hiss. It will degrade each time you play the record. Thats not up for debate. How much, or how little, that is up for debate. And also, how you store your vinyl has a big impact on how they age. (but the medium will always age) Anyway :thats what you are referring too. How much. But how much isn't the issue: it is, unmistakenly, always there. It's physics. You can't deny it.

On the same hq hifi setup a hq hifi (super) cd player will at the very least sound equally good. It will never hiss. It will never crack. It will never pop. It will not degrade.

Most times it will sound better. It will always sound cleaner. But we don't like cleaner. We like stuff that creeks. We, people, like things which seem to "live". It makes it easier to relate too. It's why we cannot say goodbye to big steamengines of bygone eras. Its why we loooove the sound of high octane ICE's and still use them a lot while we all know electric is probably better in every way. And the same applies to music: the pops and hisses make it sound more authentic, more alive. And this is where science goes of the rails and feelings take over. Its a slippery slope.

Op is talking about the loudness war. Look it up, its a real thing, but reading your comment you must be aware already. "remasters" these days are all most always oversteered in every way possible because... Reasons. I recently listened to a vinyl remaster of a 90s dance record: horrible on hifi. But sufficient on a Bluetooth phonogram player.

Like you said: nobody plays on hifi anymore. So its getting remastered more and more for shit setups. Sonos. Bluetooth headphones and the likes. And while sounding nice, that is a far cry from hifi.

When playing your original cd's you get the original remaster. Not that oversteered shit on apple music, youtube or Spotify which sound horrible on a hifi setup. There is a very definite difference. Easy to spot.

And tbh: I'm guilty too. I chose the comfort (ease of use) of sonos over the sound quality of a hifi setup. In the end it costed the same and my wife is happier without the cabling. Living (together) is always compromising ;).

I get why people chose vinyl. It's the experience. It's like smoking cigars in a lounge with some friends while drinking brandy. But like those cigars vinyl is not the best choice. But I do like cigars and brandy anyway...

And lastly: no. Ripping LPs is a tough job taking at least the playtime of the album. Cd's can be ripped and the files automatically named in minutes.

Is ripping LPs complex? No. But it takes a good setup and it takes a lot of time. You dont need neither when ripping cd's.

So, anyway: physics, science, support the statement "cds are superior to vinyl". It's measurable. You may not like it, you may miss the authenticity but the dynamic range coming of a cd vs lp setup (of the same cost, mind you) is almost always better.

But hey, I'm no bob Dylan. Who never was and still isn't a fan of anything digital. He swears he misses something. I don't. I look at the science and see better numbers for cds.

And I do believe that analog recordings of anything (sound and vision) can always be superior to digital. Digital always has a max. So many pixels. So many kbit. Analog does not have that problem. The only problem analog has, is the medium on which it is set on. That has limitations. And those limitations always always result in a lower quality then what you can easily achieve with digital. At home. (for a reasonable cost) add a megapixel. Add a mbit. In the end it will and has crossed the anolog boundaries of the used mediums far and wide.

view more: next ›