PelicanGay

joined 2 years ago
[–] PelicanGay@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I heard about this on Reddit, but was pretty skeptical about it. This changes my mind 😅

 

To summarize, clitoral anatomy is pretty big, nervy, and in some way parallel to penis anatomy. Centuries ago the knowledge was there but then went missing from western clinical science, and the pedagogy is still catching up.

[–] PelicanGay@beehaw.org 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I can relate to this, and it's not about corporates in my case. In my offline social network, there are certain topics or rants that I can't tell because they won't understand, or rants that I feel they're equally helpless of. That's why I often come back online, but no matter the platform, well, I'm just prone to addiction I guess and it's hard to disengage because there's no strict stopping cues.

With fediverse (especially about Mastodon), I also find it difficult to match my values to instances' values (I tend to be centrist). It can feel like I'm a social outcast again, seeing all those people enjoying their existence online.

3
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by PelicanGay@beehaw.org to c/science@beehaw.org
 

Found it few months ago while writing a science-related critical review. It's sOoOoOoOo useful with its generated paper summaries ahahahah

I also think that SourceData could be useful.