Orbitrix

Boosting vs upvoting / downvoting is needlessly confusing and very different from Reddit. Maybe there's a good reason I haven't heard of as to why they did it like that but... Most people haven't even seen the "you should know" post explaining how it's even a thing. That's my only Kbin complaint

Feddit is the name of a Lemmy/kbin style federated instance.

F

This is going to achieve Elon's goal but not for the reasons he thinks. It's going to continue making the site not worth scraping, no matter what the limits are. Rofl.

I grew up being exposed to Nichiren Buddhism, which is of the Mahayana tradition, through my mother. So I never really "chose" that, but it is what opened the door to all of this for me.

Because of my status as someone in recovery from substance abuse, and because I've always disliked organized "religion" of any kind, I prefer to simply practice the Dharma secularly (through a Sangha/fellowship like Recovery Dharma). No strict tradition. No organizational structure. No figureheads. Peer lead Buddhism, using the Dharma like it's a computer programming manual for your brain and life.

That's the way I incorporate Buddhism into my life.

Contributing distributed resources to existing instances is an interesting concept.... I suppose it could be setup like traditional load balancing in a tradition web application environment.

I am absolutely in love with the federated aspect of all of this though, and contributing resources that way. However, I fear that it might limit the size of any one community or instance to a point that it will never be exactly like reddit, in terms of huge monolithic communities for certain hobbies, etc. Which whether that's good or bad is another discussion.

Allowing the contribution of resources to existing instances could be a political/social/interpersonal nightmare too though, where fighting and threats of removing resources could be used as influence.... which would drive people into the existing federated system we already have. So IDK. its an interesting discussion but I don't know if its the greatest idea yet or not.

For example what if I have a ton of money and am able to contribute more server resources to kbin.social than even kbin.social (or anyone else) can manage.... I now basically own and control the platform, and could pull the rug out from underneath it if I don't like something thats happening....

The only "resource" we can contribute to existing instances is really just money. And maybe some volunteer technical support. Or... start our own separate instance.

I think I've managed to debate myself out of thinking what you're thinking is a good idea though.....

Another example about why this is an interesting debate and question though: There are currently multiple "wallstreetbets" wanabees.... Its very fragmented. Nobody knows where to go. If there was an easy way through the interface to create my own "combined communities community" (combining multiple copy-cat communities across multiple instance), so I can see every post from everyone, like it was all one place. There is absolutely sort of ways to do that now, but it needs to become easier and more streamlined. That would still mean the communities are fragmented, owned, and moderated by different people. But if one goes off the rails I can just remove it from my master "wallstreetbets monolith" list. But at least that way I can view it as one single "resource" and one single community, despite being separate instances and servers.

Yea I was a prolific commenter but I think I only created maybe 6-8 posts in 14 years on reddit, and certainly never created a community. So I might have to step up. Regardless of reddit, I absolutely love the idea of the fediverse and the decentralized nature of it, so I really would like to see it succeed. It really does have to be the way forward on the internet to avoid corporate interests.