Occamsrazer

joined 1 year ago
[–] Occamsrazer@lemdro.id 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)

So let me get this straight, communism failed in China because it was like Trump?

[–] Occamsrazer@lemdro.id -2 points 1 year ago

Ok you've got to be trolling me. Goodbye.

[–] Occamsrazer@lemdro.id -1 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Mao may not have been progressive, I don't need to argue that point. But he definitely tapped into a progressive spirit driven by progressive youths and the result was a tragedy.

[–] Occamsrazer@lemdro.id -1 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Eradication of the "4 olds" was a deliberate effort by the communist party to destroy old culture, in order to replace it with something new. Since when do conservatives strive to destroy and overturn existing, established culture? That literally the opposite of conservative. Or is your argument that it isn't necessarily conservatives, but it's not progressives either?

[–] Occamsrazer@lemdro.id -3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

There will always be conservatives since it's a relative term. But I'm guessing that you are referring to the Republican party, of which roughly half of the country belongs to, comprising everything from moderates to extremists, just like the Democrat party has. How can you preach about subverting democracy in the same breath as advocating to silence half of the country? People who cannot coexist with different opinions or world views, who lack empathy and cannot understand nuance, cannot function and don't belong in democracy. Why don't you drop the mask and admit to being an extremist authoritarian? and in that case don't even bother talking about democracy.

[–] Occamsrazer@lemdro.id -2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

What part of the Chinese revolution do you feel was done right, what part of it makes you think it's a good idea and that you want to try it in America?

[–] Occamsrazer@lemdro.id 5 points 1 year ago

Yes, it's a way to move forward with incomplete knowledge, when you need to make assumptions regardless of which theory you go with. There will always be an asterisk by theories or decisions made with this method, because one of more of the assumptions themselves could later turn out to be incorrect, thereby invalidating your decision. Occams razor is very misunderstood and used or quoted incorrectly all the time.

[–] Occamsrazer@lemdro.id 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gotta go with "skate or die: bad n rad"

[–] Occamsrazer@lemdro.id 2 points 1 year ago

Plus it has a sweet soundtrack

[–] Occamsrazer@lemdro.id 1 points 1 year ago

I had similar experiences, and couldn't understand why they would discourage dialog and discussion around various issues. The thing is, they don't actually want dialog, they want to stamp out opposition to their views as though it never existed.

view more: ‹ prev next ›