Martineski

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] Martineski@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nope, titles have qualities that could be considered universally good or universally bad so if you know your shit then you can make consistently very good titles.

[–] Martineski@lemmy.fmhy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Yeah, transition that that future will be painful

[–] Martineski@lemmy.fmhy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

If someone wants to include the image in the body of the post or in a comment use this syntax:

![](direct link to the imgae)

Direct link is a link that ends with .png or whatever image extension.

[–] Martineski@lemmy.fmhy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

They don't need to be so big an high tho

Edit: And this was the point of the meme, not that they're completely useless

[–] Martineski@lemmy.fmhy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Must be something about this paying program where they pay people for getting karma and awards.

[–] Martineski@lemmy.fmhy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Happened to me where someone got over twice the upvotes when they reposted my post 6 days later

Edit: not oc meme tho

[–] Martineski@lemmy.fmhy.ml 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

!outside@lemmy.world seems to be the only one

Edit: Stats of the sub

[–] Martineski@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I take a modicum of comfort in the fact that no one will want to watch “half this actor and half this one with a dash of this one thrown in” because that’s weird and not enticing. After the initial novelty, I imagine those films will struggle.

What are humans and their personalities other than just a mix of other people (genetics) and some random stuff thrown in? The ai generated humans and real humans are not different. It's just that the ai generated humans wouldn't exist physically in the real world. But that doesn't matter though, movies are all about selling the illusion of the world they represent, you don't need real stuff to represent fictional worlds. Take books for example, books don't have actors and they sell pretty damn well, we still immerse ourselves into those worlds and see each character as a separate entity.

[–] Martineski@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

And I think that being cavalier about letting massive corporations’ AI amass all the power they want while we all use it for fun is incredibly foolish.

Open Source FTW

This isn’t the vanguard of the revolution. This is the elite creating a system that doesn’t replace us so we can live free. It’s about creating competing software that can do the fucking creative work. (a.k.a., those of us that found something we can stomach doing for our living in this backwards ass system.)

This is why fast transition from the current world to post-work world is important. If the transition will be slow it will be very unpleasant for everyone. And again, open source FTW.

How can anyone—especially people in antiwork—be supportive of AI built by the most massive and dangerous tech companies going after the artists that have managed to make a living creating that art first?

Open source FTW and we need to push the governments for UBI and such as a transition to post work world.

How is the concept of AI the good guy here? Writing, digital art, acting? Literally some of the only creative endeavors we have to survive on in this fucking capitalist hellscape.

Uhhh, you can still write and draw whatever you want, it's just that the art will be available to more people. More people will be able to create characters, worlds, images etc. more easly which is very cool.

Did you see the deadline article, where an executive said the current negotiating tactics for the writers is “wait until they start losing their apartments?” And you’re…supportive of this?

Why would I support this?

Also: your last argument is about…the ongoing profitability of films? Not about human enjoyment or surviving in a capitalist dystopia or the human experience of creating and appreciating art, but…the vampiric studios’ ability to continue profiting after an actor gets canceled? The fuck?

Bruh, just bruh... The argument was about not having a fictional character tied to the real world person which will allow you to disconnect from the real world and immerse into the medium even further.

[–] Martineski@lemmy.fmhy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

I still think that movies will be more popular than theater because they’re just easier to access

I forgot about AR and VR. I'm pretty sure that in the future we will have technology to see and hear the videos/streams as if you were in that place so theater may actually be quite popular if it's adapted well.

[–] Martineski@lemmy.fmhy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (6 children)

How about not having to work to be alive and having time to do the things you like?

[–] Martineski@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I want an ai tool that automatically chooses the best titles for posts with no hype stuff. Current models are not capable to understand the full context of articles/papers to then choose the title that will work well in the real world.

 
212
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Martineski@lemmy.fmhy.ml to c/antiwork@lemmy.fmhy.ml
 
 
 
 
 
 

If you are lurker please help us grow the community by commenting and posting interesting on topic quality info/discussions so we can attract more people and make this community more interesting to spend time on. ✌️

Previous milestone: https://lemmy.fmhy.ml/post/473785

 
 
 
 
 
view more: ‹ prev next ›