Louise

joined 1 year ago
[–] Louise@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you don't have a Switch OR 3DS and are only going to choose based on the Pokemon games, it's a bit tricky because there's tons of good options.

Switch is a current and active console getting ports and games and content so if you get it, you'll be able to keep up with any new Pokemon games and see where you want to go from there.

3DS has support for any pre-Switch game thanks to emulation, backwards compatability, and the 3DS library and you can do whatever you like there.

As for strictly games, it's really a toss up between what you like. The 3DS era and Switch era both have a lot going for them as well as flaws.

XY are a bit mediocre because they were the jump to 3D and had to make some compromises to even get the game out, so while they were hugely ambitious, they are also very lacking in content and never got a third version but still fairly solid games. I wouldn't say they are the best for getting into newer titles though since they still are a decade old and flawed and there are better places to begin.

ORAS are hailed as some of the best remakes since aside from a few things missing from the original games, they add so much extra and new content and fun that they're pretty beloved. If you like Emerald and want to now just do the same region in 3D, it's not a bad choice.

Sun/Moon/Ultra Sun/Ultra Moon are... odd. I personally love them, but they were a little controversial at release because they are more linear than other games in the series, but they do a lot of really great things and popular additions like regional variants of Pokemon. It's the ultimate 3DS Pokemon in that it has all Mega Evolutions, Z Moves, Gen 1-7 Pokemon, and a lot of fun content to play. The real downside is just that it's linear, and Ultra versus regular is confusing. The Ultra versions add more content and are overall better but change the plot of the game for the worse in kind of ruining the story at the end for the sake of justifying being a revision. I'd keep that in mind when making a choice, though you could just play Ultra and watch the original game cutscenes later. They're overall though very solid!

SWSH is probably the most controversial game here and the first of the Switch entries. It isn't an awful game and it is very easy to get into as a beginner but it's more linear than SUMO and USUM, it introduced "Dexit" (no longer having every Pokemon ingame), and it is pretty mediocre in many areas. It's more disappointing than horrible, so if you're new you probably will enjoy it, but it essentially feels like a 3DS era game lacking features of the 3DS but playable on the Switch with a few bonuses that are cool. The DLC did, however, get really good reviews because it was fun but it'll cost more to get.

BDSP is also controversial because it's... a faithful remake? Okay, full disclaimer that I greatly dislike Diamond and Pearl, but these games are very similar to the originals so if you just want to play the DS games with a fresh coat of paint, this works fine. Most people are upset it wasn't more than just a remake, but it being just a 1x1 remake made Arceus possible, so it's a compromise. I'd recommend it if you want to play DP but more modern or a DS-era feeling game with modern mechanics. Otherwise, you may not enjoy it.

Legends Arceus is the least controversial Switch title; it only got flack for looking kind of ugly. It's a greatly fun and fresh experience with open zones you can go through (like Monster Hunter) and it's a very fun standalone title and all Pokemon can be caught. It has unique gameplay for battles and catching that no other game has, so it's absolutely a good option if you either like Sinnoh, want something new but still Pokemon, or just want a good Switch game that most people enjoy a lot.

And finally, SV. This is also controversial because it not only looks ugly but runs horribly, but honestly, I'd say it's one of the funnest titles in the entire franchise. It makes it very open for you to do whatever you want and has some really cool things it does that no other game has done and the multiplayer, while limited, is hilarious and made the experience a blast when playing with friends for the entire campaign. I'd suggest this if you like the idea of a game more like Arceus but also more classic in its structure because it is the best and worst of both worlds. Just note that it still runs poorly, though I would say the only real bugs I had were mostly visual (still ran terrible though).

Those are my thoughts; you have tons of options and honestly can just start anywhere, the nice thing is because of the variety you can just pick whatever you feel is funnest to you and most like what you want to play rather than what the internet thinks since the recent games have had a lot of frustration (not without reason though). Hope this writeup helps!

[–] Louise@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you choose one of the three, note that:

  • Cyberpunk is still pretty flawed and has issues and you'll get less battery life though it's a lot better now than at launch and certainly playable
  • FFVII Remake is only half of the original FFVII, so you'll end on a cliff hanger and be waiting for the continuation
  • No Man's Sky started with tons of issues but is now really content filled and open and polished and at this point pretty well liked

Based on those, I would lean towards No Man's Sky since it has the least amount of concerns (in my opinion).

But if you just want a good story, NieR: Replicant and NieR: Automata are amazing and worth checking out (we have a Lemmy at !nier@lemm.ee) and I'd just really recommend it for the plot alone. Both are on sale and run pretty well, and Replicant is the first game while Automata is the sequel, and opinions heavily vary on which is better on story since they are both fantastic but Automata is more polished. They're also both standalone, so you can play in either order, though I'll always recommend Replicant first. They aren't perfect games but will nail the music and plot, as those are the things most highly praised about them. They're also very depressing!

Rain World isn't AAA but it certainly feels premium and I'd recommend it if you want a really beautiful and interesting open world, but be warned that it's incredibly hard. It's not a game for everybody but it's really amazing and I think it's worth mentioning because the world is huge. Great music there too!

[–] Louise@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

It's unfortunately an issue with Lemmy itself. Instances have limitations in what they actually see and how they connect and that is one of them. See my recent post; similar issue and cause.

[–] Louise@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Funny enough, an artist called Fallout Boy did recently do a We Didn't Start The Fire parody to try and be more up to date on content.

That said, aside from being completely out of order, it's controversial for some of its... questionable lyrical choices, for lack of a better word.

[–] Louise@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Clearly the community name should be Dudunsparce.

[–] Louise@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Third party apps let you get the benefit of choosing exactly what works best for you and getting a setup you enjoy. Most of the focus by instance admins would be on ensuring everything doesn't implode and managing fees, but third party apps have a pure focus on usability and dedicate all their resources to making the best experience possible and then the end result is usually way nicer.

This message is being written on a third party app, funny enough! Memmy to be specific.

[–] Louise@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It unfortunately takes a long while to pick up. When it picks up, it really goes all in though, there's a reason it and the first game in the series (NieR Replicant) are praised as some of the best stories in video games ever made.

It just... really takes its time. I would say Replicant gets into the meat of everything sooner while Automata is a slow burn until it's time for the game to twist everything on its head. Completely fair if you don't like that kind of thing, but there is good reason for the praise.

Edit: Was using Memmy for this and it duplicate my comment twice, sorry!

[–] Louise@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

It unfortunately takes a long while to pick up. When it picks up, it really goes all in though, there's a reason it and the first game in the series (NieR Replicant) are praised as some of the best stories in video games ever made.

It just... really takes its time. I would say Replicant gets into the meat of everything sooner while Automata is a slow burn until it's time for the game to twist everything on its head. Completely fair if you don't like that kind of thing, but there is good reason for the praise.

[–] Louise@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

It unfortunately takes a long while to pick up. When it picks up, it really goes all in though, there's a reason it and the first game in the series (NieR Replicant) are praised as some of the best stories in video games ever made.

It just... really takes its time. I would say Replicant gets into the meat of everything sooner while Automata is a slow burn until it's time for the game to twist everything on its head. Completely fair if you don't like that kind of thing, but there is good reason for the praise.

[–] Louise@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Really good game! I actually run on Reddit two subs for the series (r/drakengard and r/okbuddyyorha) so it's really neat to see this recommendation here and it's pretty solid.

I would say though that this game is a standalone sequel to NieR Replicant (also amazing), and while you can play either in any order, I think the experience is better if played after Replicant. That said, both run pretty well on the Deck and both go on sale often!

Shameless plug, if you like the series, we also have an instance for the series at lemm.ee/c/nier. Anyways

[–] Louise@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I think it's not really undermining Valve's efforts since both have their own pros and cons. Valve's work is absolutely incredible considering how talking about playing triple A games on Linux would get you laughed at even just a few years ago and now they have a computer that excels at doing so, but like Windows, but it's still got its own weaknesses and I think it's good to look at both for what they can and can't do. Most of my games are installed on the Steam OS side but I spend more time in Windows so I can use all the many tools I need to be able to access for everyday life. Both have their own uses and I think the fact that the device is so easily able to handle them is wonderful and don't undermine but rather compliment each other in filling the pitfalls the others have. Those are my thoughts at least, and why I personally use both (not trying to say you need to use Windows, but just my own thoughts from using them each).

[–] Louise@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wouldn't really say they use that power to "snuff innovation," Windows was the operating system which is why everything is built around it most of the time and they worked on making sure XCloud would work with the Steam Deck. It's just how it works with any operating system being different in that you'll need to jump through additional hoops to make something from other operating systems work with other ones. Not saying Windows isn't flawed or that Microsoft doesn't have its own corrupt practices, but I wouldn't say that they attack compatibility for non-Windows things.

view more: ‹ prev next ›