Gonna avoid stepping on other toes.
Also shout-out toSayonara Zetsubou Sensei who's op feels drastically different with context.
I'm playing Devil's Advocate here. How long is the notice up? In the past, I've played games and looked up ways to remove intro videos like logo splashscreens for games I play a decent amount of. If it's there for 5-10 seconds and I wanted to speedrun the game for example, I can imagine wanting to remove it without any bigotry.
Edit: if it can be disabled that destroys my point.
The tweets give off the same energy as people who do something mundane like drink a coffee and by not getting a flamboyant one question their sexuality. But that one is always played off as a joke.
We can't look for signs or we will start applying them to people. If my son enjoys female-associated hobbies, that shouldn't be an indicator of a anything other than I should nurture it.
The character customisation is pretty bad that's one reason. It's extremely rigid to the point you can't even change eye colour. Worse then 7',s even, without even comparing it fairly to Soul Calibur made by the same company. Basically or you can do is put a chapter in casual wear or find something kind of similar and colour the clothes in.
Is it the boomers this time? I remember millennials thinking that about zoomers and now they've grown up, zoomers have been saying it about Gen Alpha calling them iPad babys
If you tried the customisation, it feels extremely bare bones in comparison to Tekken 7. So I wouldn't be surprised if stuff was removed to add to the Store.
The insecure need to deny the "gayness" is quite childish and perpetuates damaging homophobia,
you can identify as a man, fuck men, and not identify as gay.
Hopefully you are talking about a broader spectrum because this feels contradictory. Bordering the spectrum is not helpful. We striving for people to be more open. There isn't anything to be ashamed of suggesting you are gay, even if you only like a very specific subset. In most cases the avoidance to the word is not because it's too exclusive but because they are afraid of the label.
You shouldn't be ashamed, or shamed for your private life if it doesn't hurt people
Aha, so this is what they mean by "Eat the rich"
It suggests they can't afford to pay rent. It's an old stereotype that is kind of redundant nowadays since (a) most people renting can't afford it anymore and (b) different cultures are way more accepting and even encouraged living with your family. Most people understand that now.
You still here the saying buts it's more about NEETs taking advantage of family rather than being smart
I liked the concept of Kakarot but boy was it full of filler. Other than that we've had a One Piece RPG which was supposedly alright and a Fairy Tail game which was supposedly alright. We had Dragon Ball Fighters which is one of the most visually impressive Dragon Ball games imo. And we had the Shounen Jump game which seemed like it was supposed to be a big deal anyway but wasn't great.
On a different note there's a Shin-chan and Doraemon game for something more low stakes.
I've been hearing rumblings of people complaining about current game advertisement cycles being too long. Immortals, is a great example of one too short. Announced at Summer Game Fest and released in August(?). We don't need long Ad campaigns for old brands but if you want to market a new IP as Triple A you have to put in the work to reach unplugged gamers, and it barely reached plugged in gamers.
I was going to add Ao Ashi OP2 also as it immediately stood out but I don't think it hits as hard without context. It is better produced but the same vibes as Ace of Diamond OP3 where when you are invested in the character it hits way better