IDontHavePantsOn

joined 1 year ago
[–] IDontHavePantsOn@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago

Not trying to downplay your plight at all, but in America this is also the case. Not only are doctors visits expensive to an extremely outrageous extent, but you might not be able to find one that can take you.

Waitlists for medical, dental, psychiatric etc doctors in my area are a minimum of 3 months long.

A few years ago I called the largest network of therapists in my area for an appointment. They told me I would be on a wait list and I probably wouldn't hear back for 6 weeks. I got a call 6 months later.

Medical doctors and dentists are even worse. No wait lists at all. Emergency clinics full of low quality doctors and practitioners are popping up everywhere because most people don't go to the doctors enough to still be an active patient. They don't go enough to be seen because they can't afford to go unless they are truly terribly sick. Those clinics charge far more, do far less, and care the minimal amount about patients.

A quick look in your ear? $150. You have a real problem? Well, they will charge you the $150 and then tell you to go to the hospital.

I have never heard of anyone in my area getting a dentist appointment in less than 3 months. To even get patient status takes a friend knowing that their doctor is taking new patients. And the chances are that if you can't afford a doctor, your friends can't either.

[–] IDontHavePantsOn@lemm.ee 20 points 11 months ago (3 children)

"Hi this is adult film star Brandi Maxxx..."

[–] IDontHavePantsOn@lemm.ee -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Show me on the cybertruck where Elon touched you.

[–] IDontHavePantsOn@lemm.ee -1 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I can't really fathom that anyone seriously thinks that aesthetic preferences are uniform across all people without biases similar to what you listed.

All those SUVs designs sure are strikingly different.

[–] IDontHavePantsOn@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Wouldn't it be weird if neither of us had pants on?

[–] IDontHavePantsOn@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Blue on white?! Disgusting! White on white? Yum!

You do you though. More cheese for me.

[–] IDontHavePantsOn@lemm.ee 34 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I've heard some of the more advanced bullshit detectors have pressure pads that the bullshiter sits on to measure how much actual shit they are holding back while taking a bullshit test to detect the actual bullshit, but that might be bullshit.

[–] IDontHavePantsOn@lemm.ee 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (8 children)

I love taking the wind out of Elon's sails because he is just a horrible and cringe person to an extreme degree, but I personally like the cybertruck aesthetically. It definitely different from anything we have seen in a truck, and I'm all for it. It's also basically a concept car that is somehow actually making it to market, and if it motivates the bigger auto makers to take more chances with their designs and ideas, I think it's great.

That said, its so ludicrously expensive, and so impractical/not advisable for all the reasons I would personally use a truck, because it's basically an SUV with a bed. It's like a Chevy Avalanche/Honda Ridgeline mashup. This thing is the ultimate pavement princess. If there's one thing I wouldn't be an early adopter for, it's something thats whole purpose is to get beat the fuck up.

[–] IDontHavePantsOn@lemm.ee 13 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Let's take a step back from this pointless argument. Shrink rates have been between 1-2% for arguably forever. Retailers currently are aghast that their shrink losses went from $90 billion to $120 billion! Yikes! That sounds like a big increase!

Yet, that shrink percentage has not significantly increased. It's been around 1.5% for a few years now. Doesn't that make you wonder though? If the percentage of shrink loss isn't increasing, how are the losses increasing 33%? And even more perplexing is, how are these companies posting record profits? Quarter after quarter their profits are increasing as much as 6% even with these record breaking shrinkage losses.

It's almost as if they have taken advantage of the publics attention of COVID era inflation, and price gouged the retail market. It's like they priced their products 33% higher than they were, in order to make record profits, and those higher prices can easily be conflated into record shrinkage losses.

Weird. I'm sure that can't be what's happening though. My always friendly Walmart has always been set on giving me the cheapest prices possible. They couldn't be trying to change the narrative to make it seem like customers are thieves. They love their customers, and would never patronize them for something as greedily evil as a drop in their revenue bucket.

[–] IDontHavePantsOn@lemm.ee 36 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Or every other cheese, or yogurt, sour cream, etc...

It's like everyone puts on their blinders. Every time you hear cultured, fermented, or the big ol' stupid blanket term "probiotic", it means bacteria, mold, or yeast. Every time you hear "active", that means it's live organisms.

We all love to eat bacteria, mold and yeast. It all depends on the type.

[–] IDontHavePantsOn@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Say what you want about bulimia, but that shit does work.

[–] IDontHavePantsOn@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

I'll listen to the podcast because I'm sure there's info in it that will be new to me, but I do know drug scheduling creates a purgatory that makes substances difficult to research. When the scheduling means that it can't be produced in amounts to create meaningful clinical studies, the "drugs with no currently accepted medical use" definition is difficult to get out of.

To add on to that, if John Hopkins research labs, the same one that came up with CPR, water purification, and genetic engineering, thinks psilocybin has medical use and merit, I believe them.

view more: ‹ prev next ›