GoodEye8

joined 1 year ago
[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 7 points 4 days ago

In general I agree, because their campaign definitely could've been better and it should've been better. But on the other hand this election wasn't genocide or no genocide, without a significant shift in either political party that would happen regardless. If you really wanted to twist it into "genocide or no genocide" then that vote was "completely support genocide" or "begrudgingly support genocide".

But really this election was between "full steam straight into fascism" and "chance to not go into fascism". It's obvious that if you don't vote for the latter you either want fascism or don't care that you're getting fascism. That is on the voters. They could've voted to pass the fascism buck to the next election, but they didn't. Now America is getting fascism.

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

You are right about stupid people falling for stupid shit, but that's not why democrats lost. Trump got less votes than he did in 2020, that 70 million who voted for Trump are just people who love what Trump says.

What made democrats lose are the 16 million votes Biden got that Harris didn't get. The GOP didn't magically make those votes disappear, those missing votes is the failure of the democratic party.

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 5 points 4 days ago

She nailed it? You mean like how for 8 years she thought the border wall is a stupid idea and then suddenly she pivots into "yup, we totally need that wall"? Or when she got all buddy buddy with the likes of Cheney when the core democrats loathe Cheney? She had time to appeal to the republican voters but not to the 16 million voters who voted for Biden and not her? She had plenty of time to nail her campaign and she didn't.

And I'll just add this as a non-American. It's a very American thing to think election campaigns have to be long, because they are long in America. She got over 3 months to campaign and that would've been enough time in most countries. Just to give some context: Mexico's president campaigned for 93 days, Canada's last federal election was 36 days, Australian president campaigned for 36 days, India campaign was 33 days, Brazil was 90 days.

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 6 points 5 days ago

8-10 years ago he was definitely viewed more favorably. His image didn't start to slip until he called that diver a pedo and that was back in 2018. 8-10 years ago he was the electric cars and spaceships to mars guy.

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 5 points 6 days ago

I agree that the red flag made it easy for him to win, but not because of the free pitstop, it's because Merc and McLaren made the wrong strategy call.

Everybody knows that if the race conditions require wets there's a high chance the race is called off. Both Merc and McLaren pitted before the worst rain which means they weren't waiting to see if the race is called off. Had the race been called off I don't think people would be looking at Max. I think people would be questioning why Merc and McLaren decided to pit early. The red flag was beneficial to Max because Merc and McLaren made the wrong call by pitting early.

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You can take your hyperbole and get back on the "I hate Max Verstappen" train. It's pretty obvious you're one of those people.

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

Did you watch the same race as the rest of us? He didn't just cruise into first position, he passed half the grid before the red flag.

And pretty ironic calling others thin skinned when you're the one who can't accept that Max was phenomenal this race. Every comment trying to downplay his racing.

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 14 points 6 days ago (7 children)

17 fastest laps and finishing 19 seconds ahead of Ocon begs to differ. Max would've won even if he had pitted under the safety car and he would've beaten Norris even without a safety car. Nobody had the pace Max had. The red flag made his race easier but it didn't "make all the difference".

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

I appreciate the effort but I'm not American. I simply follow American politics because sadly American politics impacts the rest of the world.

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

In vacuum I agree. In the US electoral system voting for a third party is almost the same not voting at all, so it really doesn't matter if you vote for third party or you vote for nobody. My issue is that in the context of America voting third party makes no sense, especially this election. By voting third party you don't care who gets elected and it makes no sense to me because who goes "I don't really care if fascists come into power and start oppressing women and foreigners". Who the fuck is indifferent to fascism? Apparently third party voters.

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 49 points 1 week ago (11 children)

And how exactly does a free fly invalidate the article about refunds requiring an NDA? Nobody is questioning whether there's is some semblance of a game in a project that has been in development for over a decade, it would be a massive red flag if there's wasn't. What people are questioning is why is there a secret shop page that players can access ONLY after they've spent a thousand dollars on the game, and then another secret shop page after they've spent 10k? What's up with the predatory practices?

Is your response "No no no, don't look at those controversies. Look at how pretty the game is"? A free fly event doesn't invalidate the claim that you might need to sign an NDA to get a refund. It doesn't invalidate the claim that the devs had to pull 7 day work weeks. There are loads of criticism that the free fly does not address at all. These articles would exist even if everyone tried the free fly.

From my experience games that get "hate articles" are games that are already doing questionable things. You don't get such articles circulating about good games because that shit just won't stick. When it comes to SC and CI that shit does stick.

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 11 points 1 week ago

It is autopilot (a poor one but still one) that legally calls itself cruise control so Tesla wouldn't have to take responsibility when it inevitably breaks the law.

view more: ‹ prev next ›