Flyswat

joined 1 year ago
[–] Flyswat@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Science is based on the principle of the inference to the most plausible. When you have multiple theories explaining a phenomenon, the one which makes the most sense with regards to the gathered data is deemed THE explanation. That is, until another theory comes with more compelling data and evidences.

Example: the "static universe" cosmological model

Science is basically our best understanding of the world. Doesn't mean it's 100% true, but it's how far we got.

[–] Flyswat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Think about the lost revenue! Insane!

[–] Flyswat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That he did, of course.

[–] Flyswat@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Calling it magic is no different than people in ancient times ascribing what they didn't know or understand to magic.

Just give it an unbiased read, you might be surprised :)

[–] Flyswat@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

With all due respect, have you read the Qur'an? How can you judge something without actually looking into it?

I won't hold this against you because you are saying it out of ignorance, but just know that Islam is the fastest growing religion in the US and in Europe, the average age of reverts is 27, the most reverts are postgraduates who spent in average 7 years studying the religion.

[–] Flyswat@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (6 children)

We do not have the same paradigm, that's for sure. That's why we need to learn about each other's views.

Islam's is: God created mankind and put it on earth for a propose. He gave us this life which is a test with do's and don'ts. And depending on whether we follow the rules or not there is eternal bliss or eternal punishment.

Why am I or others positing this? Because God sent throughout our existence messengers to remind us of our purpose.

Why should we trust these so called messengers? They were granted miracles, ie. things others cannot perform like splitting the sea, reviving the dead, splitting the moon etc.

He also gave these messengers scripture with the laws to abide by. Where are these scriptures? Most of them were lost (Abraham's tablet, David's psalms...) or demonstrably corrupted by people (the old and the new testaments). The last scripture revealed is the Qur'an which is demonstrably preserved for everyone to read.

Read it and read about Muhammad's life and you'll understand what so called "Islam" ("peace through submission" in Arabic) is.

[–] Flyswat@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Here's a video on this presentism fallacy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzXN6Mv9k8A

[–] Flyswat@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

Sex organs are something that males and females have in different forms, but it is disingenuous to say this is the only difference.

The man MUST provide for the house. The woman is not obliged to work and bring money, but she can do it if she wants. The way you phrased it can be understood that she is barred from working when this is not the case. Prophet Muhammad's (pbuh) first wife Khadija was a successful tradeswoman for example. So the religion does not automatically make women financially dependant. There is abuse in some Muslim countries, no doubt like everywhere, but religion is not the reason.

Moreover, whatever the woman earns is 100% hers if she chooses to, and the man has no claim on it in Islam. She can put that to use for the house expenses, or not if she chooses to. It's her right. Usually working women help the household's finances but it's up to couples to decide how they want to function.

[–] Flyswat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Exactly how she wanted it to be perceived. She was protesting racism against the non-whites.

Context: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ibmsdJ5R0b0

[–] Flyswat@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

She clarified why she did that in an interview. It's quite funny.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ibmsdJ5R0b0

view more: ‹ prev next ›