Ferrous

joined 5 months ago
[–] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 26 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

And they were right to try. Trujillo was a monster.

Edit: and also the invasion catalyzed the assassination of Trujillo

[–] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 36 points 3 months ago (10 children)

I mean, the $200 does encourage me to create a monopoly and simultaneously extract maximum wealth from my opponents while also taking their homes. Not sure if the monopoly analogy is useful here.

UBI is capitalists' best attempt at breathing life into capitalism. The benefits of UBI in the global north would still be at the expense of exploitation in the global south.

[–] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago (24 children)
[–] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Wym? Am I missing something? Either should work, right? I am most familiar with it described as Fourier analysis which to me is synonymous with analysis in the frequency domain.

[–] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If you think the issue lies in one bombastic and opportunistic president, and not our deity-like elevation of these lifetime-appointed robed clerics who are the only ones we entrust to interpret the constitution as if they have some divine patriotism, then you have been oriented by the democratic party away from what would otherwise be discontentment with the political system, and instead against the republican party which, as it just so happens, makes you fall in line with the democratic party and their fundraising strategies. The democrats desperately want you to ignore the gaping insecurities, volatility, and exploitation in our political system and instead instill a fear of Republicans.

Trump merely saw how easy it'd be to capture our judicial system that was devised by 20 year old white slavers only 4 generations ago. He correctly identified how the Supreme law of the land is all based on a flimsy interpretation of the honor system: we appoint justices for life and basically just trust them to play nice for their entire tenure without provisions to deal with judicial capture. It's honestly a miracle we've gotten this far without more judges being captured.

[–] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What kind of thinking is this? That it's better to lose as long as you have the moral high ground? Maybe that thinking works for little league, but not when healthcare, women's rights, and climate are on the line.

"Sure the fascist uprising happened in record time, but at least we put it on the record that the fascists have occasional issues with intellectual honesty!"

Only in the liberal mindset does intellectual honesty come with more primacy than physically protecting people who are actually vulnerable.

The fact that it appears we are 1 or 2 years away from door-to-door gestapo visits, and liberals are still circle jerking about their epic, pragmatic, civil, patriotic, "play by the rules" mindset, means we are most likely doomed.

view more: ‹ prev next ›