Devjavu

joined 1 year ago
[–] Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah Ecosia probably uses the free google api and not the paid one. I use SearX. Wonderful little search engine.

[–] Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

If you can't read your car's repair manual, pay a mechanic to do it for you. I doubt they will say no. Almost every manufacturer has a rapair manual.

[–] Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Most of the data collection does not happen from my phone bRoO. I use Graphene and if I don't give my foss music app access to the internet, the app can collect as much data as it wants. Besides, what do I care if someone knows what music I listen to if in comparison the car manufacturer, who I likely gave my personal information to first hand, knows things far more private. I don't have sex in my car, but if I did I would much rather have them know that I listen to "I'm a barbie girl" on repeat. And I doubt that cutting off connection will brick your car. If that was the case, my car would brick almost every time I enter a tunnel. The car does not check for connections like an effing website. If the comms were to be completely disabled or one would remove a fuse, sure. Your car might refuse to start, throw an error what have you. But if you simply remove the antenna, all bueno. Wanna know why they don't refuse service without a connection? Because people would regularly die which makes this behaviour illegal :). And I do have to lecture you, as you seem to have a lot to learn and I don't see a reason why anybody should put their pride first. I mean don't even know anybody on here.

Oh and I did not say to randomly cut cables. I said to cut antennas. Do not under any circumstance cut a cable. It might be the windshield wipers or it might be a sensor for abs. You are absolutely correct that this is the worst idea one could have if they value their life. Well I mean no life means no privacy concerns.

[–] Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Man I would love it if Ecosia actually had decent search results. Well, guess I'll have to donate for trees.

[–] Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Oh no tapes tablet to car. Anyways, why would you entire infotainment system not work? You would just have no internet connection. Radio doesn't work, yes, however most sane humans stream music anyways which is possible via bluetooth or, in case the comms module would also disable bluetooth, cable. Your choice, private sex life or ✨features✨.

[–] Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Which doesnt matter if the sim has no power.

[–] Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 year ago (21 children)

Possibly. But wire cutters exist. Installing custom firmware for a car seems unnecessarily dangerous. Just remove the fuse, cut a wire or go to a local shop and get the comms system disabled.

[–] Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Our consciousness has developed by chance. We were not made by another conscious species, we did not make ourselves conscious. We are feeding in enourmous amounts of data into neural networks using different methods. Our nervous system does not differ much from a neural network and with the right conditions, the resulting model may have a consciousness. Those conditions are not known to us, so we try again and again and again until, by pure chance, we get a network that is self aware. I suspect that, the higher the complexity of the network, the higher the chance for something similar to our consciousness to develop.

With this, our current approach is entropy. Get as many differing conditions as possible and mash em together. It may spiral into consciousness.

[–] Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Entropy my friend

[–] Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

Of course I recognize the idfference. And I hate brave for somewhat abusing their users like they do. Still, that is not what op said. I won't repeat it again, but that fundamental difference you are speaking of was not highlighted by them. Possibly leading other people to believe that cryptocurrency is bad to use as a whole, which as yourself has said is not right if one repsects privacy.

[–] Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And of course, my mistake. Didn't mean to falsely accuse you.

[–] Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How did I make a false equivalency when the op literally called any project that "dabbles in crypto" a possible scam? That includes Signal as well as Mullvad. Op's comment does not in any way indicate the use of one's own currency, simply abolishing all services using crypto.

view more: ‹ prev next ›