CoderKat

I do think there's some use for AI in its current form (especially AI art as a tool for developing other works, like movies and video games), but I find it bizarre just how much investors value the current form of AI.

As cool as I find AI art, I'm not yet sure about it's commercial viability, given the serious legal issues it's facing. So why do investors, who are supposed to care about commercial viability, value it so much?

And for generative text, I have an even more negative stance. My understanding is that the cost to train and run those AIs is ludicrous. Sure, some companies will use it to make blog spam articles or replace their basic support staff with it, but is that really gonna make it profitable?

And I emphasized "current form" because the current AI is basically just predictive text. It's severely limited and this is extremely evident if you try to ask even basic math problems. It's not capable of actual intelligence, which is what has me very skeptical of it on the long term. Maybe these companies will come up with a new, better form of AI. Or maybe they won't. But it doesn't seem like "just increase the size of the model" is sustainable nor will frankly get closer to strong(ish?) AI.

I wonder how many of those are still the case now? When he first took over, that was absolutely huge deal, since it's extremely difficult to find another job as a visa worker. But it's not impossible and Twitter employees would have very strong resumes. It's been so long that I suspect many of those who wanted to leave could have found another company willing to sponsor by now.

There's definitely Musk fanboys in the company. There's no shortage of people, especially the "tech bro" type, who somehow still adore Musk.

The problem is that the "assault weapon" wording makes it easier for pro gun to dismiss you. The US has a lot of people obsessed with guns. I'd love if the US could just ban guns entirely, but reality is that we'd have to at least start with reasonable baby steps and cannot give them any easy way to get out. By using the "assault weapon" wording, you're just making it easier for them to dismiss gun legislation cause they'll claim "it's too vague" (even if it's not).

It's unfortunate that wording has to matter so much, especially in colloquial usage, but it's such an uphill battle to get even the slightest gun restrictions in place, so we sadly do need to be perfect. And yeah, it's stupid. It's dumb that the US can be like it is and people will still defend their guns to the death. But we have to account for that if we want to make anything better.

I wonder how much of a discount OP can get when they send their machine back?

Yeah, I learn so much from code reviews and they've saved me so much time from dumb mistakes I missed. I've also caught no shortage of bugs in other people's code that saved us all a stressful headache. It's just vastly easier to fix a bug before it merges than once it breaks a bunch of people.

Implying we'd ever get off this planet before wiping ourselves out. :/

I really preferred it on the right, too. It was the default on my Galaxy. But I have a Pixel for work and it doesn't seem to let you choose which side the back button is on. I can't stand to have an inconsistency.

My best guess is that they hope some agriculture or GMO company might have a use for it. Basically crops + future theme. Maybe they were trying to stand out from the likely vastly more common corn + person in lab coat?

https://files.catbox.moe/g9ulrf.jpg

It's likely a kbin bug (or an app if you used one to make the comment), since the slashes are there even on the website directly.

It's interesting how universal the use of colour was. I grew up in a smaller province most people don't know (or at least can't spell). The phone books were made by a crown corp that was pretty much just for the province. Yet, same colour schemes. Outside of the book was yellow. White pages for people, yellow for businesses.

Why would "something is complicated" mean you can't have a stance on it? By all means, you should be extra careful with complicated issues, but that doesn't mean you can't have an opinion or that there aren't parts that are more clear cut.

Eg, your comment reads to me like you're conflating Palestine (the largely unrecognized country) and Hamas (the terrorist group). Your Al Qaeda comment certainly reads that way. These groups and the vast majority of people support Palestine, not Hamas. So it's like sympathizing with Iraq because they got invaded after 9/11.

And the why now is pretty obvious. Because big things are happening now. Yeah, this isn't the first time Israel and Palestine have faced conflict, but it's a big time and people are afraid that Israel is going to put a complete end to Palestine this time around. If you don't speak up now, when will you?

I'm curious, were they ever that stereotypical "shh" environment that movies claimed they were? Because no public library in my lifetime was ever like that (just smaller school libraries), but I can't go back very far. Most libraries I've been to have multiple areas or floors, some which are quiet and others which are allowed to be noisy.