Claidheamh

joined 2 years ago
[–] Claidheamh 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The pressure that the metals of the reactor are put under from the radiation is a real thing, it causes damage and fatigue.

Yes.

they’re decommissioned because if you keep them running they’ll have catastrophic failures, which besides the loss of life and land

No. This is the fearmongering part. A nuclear plant that is past its service life doesn't just turn into Chernobyl.

I don't know what article you're talking about, but I'm pretty sure it won't trump my years of university education on this.

[–] Claidheamh 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

all need to be decommissioned at some point, because they will fail catastrophically if they don't.

This is false, that idea comes from decades of anti-science fearmongering. They need to be decommissioned for the same reasons as everything else, they just become too expensive to maintain. Same as every other energy source, including renewables.

[–] Claidheamh 1 points 1 year ago

That's very well put. People tend to cling to the ideas of silver bullets, and that's, more often than not, detrimental to climate goals and tends to just slow things down.

[–] Claidheamh 1 points 1 year ago

Nuclear subidies aren't even in the same order of magnitude as fossil fuel subsidies. There's so much fearmongering in that comment I don't even know where to start... Chernobyl really was the best thing to happen to the fossil fuel lobby.

go look at the history of nuclear power research and development

My friend, I went to university for this shit.

[–] Claidheamh 1 points 1 year ago

I mean, those are power companies. If you're calling public power companies "the oil and gas billionaires" then you're clearly being facetious.

When people talk about the oil and gas billionaires they are referring to the ones who spend millions on lobbying, Exxon, Shell, BP, Aramco, etc. You know, the ones funding climate change denial and nuclear fearmongering for decades.

[–] Claidheamh 1 points 1 year ago
[–] Claidheamh 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They shouldn't, but many do and have done for many years out of ignorance.

[–] Claidheamh 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This was a great opportunity to quote Douglas Adams! :)

"This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move."

[–] Claidheamh 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

Nothing lasts forever, that's true. But it's not the incisive observation one might think. NPPs are some of the power sources with the longest service lives.

[–] Claidheamh 6 points 1 year ago

Why does it need to be astroturfing? It's the same point the young climate activist in the article is making.

[–] Claidheamh 1 points 1 year ago

I was replying to your reply of the other comment.

[–] Claidheamh 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Was just trying to figure out the other comment's logic. They may have watched one too many Simpsons episodes.

view more: ‹ prev next ›