CaptainBuckleroy

joined 1 year ago
[–] CaptainBuckleroy@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

In no world is providing medical assistance to a victim accepting the exploiting behavior of the perpetrator.

Framing providing medical aid to a victim as "assisting the gunmen" to make a point is sick.

If you were a doctor in a warzone, and someone with a gun brought you their victim they just raped/abused, would you turn that patient away? What specific actions would you take in that moment?

[–] CaptainBuckleroy@lemm.ee 18 points 11 months ago

The latest generations of gnss receivers have spoofing and jamming mitigation and detection features included with the chip, and multi-band rx technology to sync to more constellations simultaneously and do exactly what you're talking about. Before then, the spoofing/jamming detection would likely need a software implementation after the receiver. There are different types of spoofing/jamming, all of which are detected and mitigated in different ways.

I don't know the commercial aircraft industry standards for updating technology, but I wouldn't be surprised if most commercial aircraft don't have what you're talking about.

[–] CaptainBuckleroy@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

It means for the first 20 years they spent all of their profit on expansion / R&D

[–] CaptainBuckleroy@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I just looked at the GitHub repo for that project. Are there any tutorials or anything out there for it that make the setup easy?

[–] CaptainBuckleroy@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also, do you believe that a suspect needs to shoot first before being considered a threat by police? I would say "armed and brandishing" would make the individual a legitimate threat.

[–] CaptainBuckleroy@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I think it's relevant because it's evidence the teen was not a threat. I don't think it's implying an armed individual would automatically be a threat.

There are articles that do draw that false equivalence, and they deserve being called out. I don't think this is one of them.

[–] CaptainBuckleroy@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Did you also get paid for the time you spent traveling?

[–] CaptainBuckleroy@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yes, you can code in machine code. I did it as part of my CS Degree. In our textbook was the manual for the particular ARM processor we coded for, that had every processor-specific command. We did that for a few of the early projects in the course, then moved onto Assembly, then C.

[–] CaptainBuckleroy@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Got it, useful info.

I'm a software engineer, but here's a bunch of stuff to consider, in no particular order.

Maybe the data engineer isn't the one to convince?

If it saves time, how much time? Would tools (I'm using the term tools broadly here) you use work differently? (Such as analytics for IBM Ibm and ibm counting differently).

Is there a solution that's the best of both worlds? If space isn't an issue can the text be preserved somehow linked to each entry? The formatted text is used for elastic search, but the original text is preserved?

Maybe "convincing" isn't the right approach, but learning is?

[–] CaptainBuckleroy@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The answer to your question is extremely use-case specific, and sounds like something to discuss with others at your workplace.

[–] CaptainBuckleroy@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Women traditionally have been discouraged from competitions, including chess. To speak in broad strokes, even in progressive locations around the world, there are still those who believe that traditional gender roles mean women should but compete. Men have a generational head start. We are at the stage where, in order to be equitable and fair, we should be creating extra opportunities for women. If we didn't, tradition and systemic practices would continue to discourage women.

Chess has no male category. There's open, and female. This allows an extra space for women to compete against each other, feel safe, and make connections and friendships with other women in the minority. While still allowing them to compete in the coed category on a level playing field.

We will most likely continue to be at this stage for generations.

[–] CaptainBuckleroy@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm going to assume you aren't trolling.

Women traditionally have been discouraged from competitions, including chess. We are at the stage where we should be creating extra opportunities for women to be involved in these competitions. If we didn't, tradition and systemic practices would continue to discourage women.

Chess has no male category. There's co-ed, and female. This allows an extra space for women to compete against each other, feel safe, and make connections and friendships with other women in the minority. While still allowing them to compete in the coed category on a level playing field.

We will most likely continue to be at this stage for generations.

view more: next ›