Big_Boss_77

I see a few bits of information about it happening at the presidential election level, but I'm not finding anything at the state and local level. Can you provide some sources on that?

It doesn't take a whole lot of money to run for city council, local officials, sherif, alderman. It takes a bit, but not millions to run for state government positions. Are you saying the federal government is quashing local and state third parties? That is where you make your sweeping electoral reforms for federal elections. Why don't we ever hear about them making moves in those races? Where are they when I go to vote for my city council? My county commissioners? Are you telling me the federal government is coming down and removing them from ballots?

That's a pretty serious accusation, and I'd love to see some sources on that, because I'm with you all the way if that's the case.

But when you've got someone who was wined and dined by an impotent dictator, and a half dozen of his cronies and yes men coming in and trying to split the vote for the best chance of preventing a take over by the impotent dictator's choice clown... and then suddenly you've got people toting her banner when she's been largely silent the past 3.5 years... it kind of makes you wonder, or it should... assuming you've got more than 3 braincells reenacting the DVD screen saver.

If third parties aren't mathematically impossible, where are all members of third party during midterms? Local elections? The work it takes to make real lasting change is done down ballot, where are they at those times? Why do they only creep up during presidential races? The above analogy may not be perfect, but it's pretty damned close... but we could also compare third party to all the lazy animals in the story of the little red hen...

In case your not familiar with the children's story...

I honestly wonder if they're not trying to imply by virtue of digging up the info yourself, you're not better for it... some real boomer shit

We found out we could by psychological validation on the internet... you're fired.

This is an article about his stocks... not his date plans with Lauren Loomer...or wtf ever her name is.

I believe this clip could explain that.

Yes, that's why they're fininig you. Was that not clearly outlined in the document?

Isn't that wild? If I'm being honest, I have to do double take and figure out if it's bullshit or not...

This is "vintage_recipes" is it not?

It's absolutely not a justification to elect the other one