Every place is the wrong place to ask this question.
Putting a label or asking a community to reveal their manifesto is not a good look or how conversations should be started.
The correct thing to do is participate in communities you seem to like and if you find out that you don't agree with that community on one or more fronts, then by all means, please create a new instance and/or community on your own and run it according to your preferences. This is the intended purpose of the fediverse: If you don't like it, do it better by yourself.
I wish to hear all opinions in here by all kinds of people.
I wish to hear the worst and the best arguments on a topic.
Doing what you ask, as in join a pro-Nintendo community will 100% have a bad outcome since it will, by definition, be an echo chamber.
People like to bash Nintendo because of them going legally against fans that decide to revive older games that no longer available to be played using legal and/or official means.
This is really a gray area and people agree/disagree on this.
If for example OOT is not able to be played at all but a dude hacks the code and puts it on an emulator, then is that wrong or not?
Legally it's wrong, but there's an argument to be made that since Nintendo doesn't offer this game, technically their are not losing profit.
Ultimately it's a totally gray area and civil discussion on the topic should be welcomed and not suppressed, ever.