Affidavit

joined 1 year ago
[–] Affidavit@aussie.zone 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

There are UN refugee camps in Lebanon and other surrounding countries where refugees from the Syrian civil war have been waiting for months and even years to be resettled in a third country like Australia; it is not fair to these people to knowingly grant tourist visas to people who are clearly not tourists, who will then almost definitely apply for onshore protection.

Cancelling the visas after granting them though is a dick move. They should never have been granted in the first place.

"At the very least, those affected must be granted temporary visas immediately so they can stay safely in Australia while any issues are resolved," he said.

There is absolutely no way that the majority of these visa holders will ever permanently depart Australia, and anyone who claims otherwise is being naive.

[–] Affidavit@aussie.zone 20 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I'm looking forward to games that really do take advantage of AI effectively. Having almost infinite variations of characters and plots would make each play through a new experience. I reckon some interesting games will be coming out in the next few years.

[–] Affidavit@aussie.zone 42 points 8 months ago (16 children)

“In effect, Yuzu turns general computing devices into tools for massive intellectual property infringement of Nintendo and others’ copyrighted works.”

So, what's the point of the Switch then? If all these devices can play any Switch game, yet Nintendo refuses to allow people to buy and run them on these devices, then it sounds to me like they've done this to themselves. I empathise for all the work developers have put into their games, but I have no sympathy for the executives who decide to make their games exclusive to an overpriced irrelevant piece of technology.

[–] Affidavit@aussie.zone 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think if someone is obtuse enough to not realise playing loud music on public transport is rude and disruptive you should consider the consequences before interacting with them. They are either 1. a bogan who thinks they're top shit, or 2. someone with a questionable mental state. Either way, the chances of them turning the music off are low and the chances of fisticuffs higher than I'd like.

I'd rather roll my eyes and fork out the extra for noise-cancelling earphones.

[–] Affidavit@aussie.zone 27 points 11 months ago (1 children)

'Bankruptcy' means an inability to pay your debts. Can he pay $1.5b? Probably not, but does he have money? Yes, he does. He is a multi-millionaire owning at least 5 properties and spends tens of thousands each month on his 'expenses'.

Don't confuse bankruptcy with poverty.

[–] Affidavit@aussie.zone 1 points 11 months ago

I support policies that grant less temporary and permanent visas and restrict student visa and temporary graduate visa holders from applying for permanent residence. I fail to see how this 'harms immigrants'. Adding and strengthening these caps is not harmful to immigrants. At worst, this is harmful to prospective non-existent immigrants. To study in Australia each and every student visa holder must make a declaration and provide supporting evidence that their intention is only to study and be a 'genuine temporary entrant'.

The government already has caps on migration, but they have been actively loosening and removing caps over the past few years. I want them back, and I want them strengthened for the wellbeing of everyone in Australia, including permanent residents. People here don't give a shit about the actual logistics and just have a hard-on for migration.

[–] Affidavit@aussie.zone 1 points 11 months ago

FFS, does anyone read? I think there should be fewer permanent visas granted, not that permanent residents shouldn't be able to buy a home. You people just want to call someone racist. Not sure if there's a word for that.

Who said anything about denying them the right to a home? I said Australia should grant less permanent visas not strip rights from existing permanent visa holders.

[–] Affidavit@aussie.zone 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

If you got 'I hate immigrants' from the content of my posts then you have shit reading comprehension.

Immigration improves lives for natural citizens. Look it up.

You're the one making this claim, it is your responsibility to back it up, not mine.

[–] Affidavit@aussie.zone 1 points 11 months ago (4 children)

What? Who said anything about denying them the right to a home? I said Australia should grant less permanent visas not strip rights from existing permanent visa holders. I am not sure you fully understand what permanent residency is; it's hardly creating second-class citizens. Permanent residency is a transition towards citizenship or an alternative for those who wish to maintain their other citizenship (for countries that won't allow dual citizenship). People who have never travelled to Australia in their life can be granted permanent residency, it makes no sense for these people to immediately be granted citizenship when they don't even know if they like Australia.

My father was a permanent resident for over 30 years before he became a citizen and I honestly don't think he ever experienced an issue.

[–] Affidavit@aussie.zone 0 points 11 months ago (6 children)

The government should focus on improving existing Australians rather than making new Australians. Boosting migration during a housing crisis is irresponsible. It isn't only permanent visas as well. The government is doing everything it can to increase the amount of people competing for housing in Australia.

Everyone who is leaving a house empty at this time should be penalised. This is just another nonsense move by the government that will have nil effect on the crisis they created.

[–] Affidavit@aussie.zone 116 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I swear dumbarses like this live in a bubble. Who in their right mind would give their identity documents or bank cards to a porn site? If the UK government enacts this silly legislation it just means UK residents will use non-UK sites.

Some people really need a reality check.

view more: ‹ prev next ›