this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
315 points (93.4% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6621 readers
123 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Neato@kbin.social 51 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's not really how we fight anymore. Buuuut if you want to see protests to rival the 70s, try doing a general draft again.

The US Military will never do another draft. The issue with the draft is that it instantly galvanizes opinions of every single American. Right now with a volunteer army, most Americans don't have an immediate family member that's deployed abroad. But if you institute the draft, they will.

Everyone will have a brother, husband, son, father, uncle, cousin, nephew, etc that has been drafted. And there's really nothing like a close personal connection to drive people to be upset and show it publicly. An unpopular war would become an impossible war very fast with the near-instantaneous speed of communication the internet allows. It would allow angry people to organize in very large groups very fast. The protests would be massive and unending.

[–] TheChurn@kbin.social 29 points 1 year ago

Towards the end, drafted troops would refuse to go on patrol, attack their officers with grenades (nearly 500 were killed this way during the war), and refuse deployment while still in the US. 50,000 troops deserted.

The lesson the military learned from Vietnam is that drafts are counterproductive. The civilian protests helped set the tenor in Washington, but it was the collapse of morale within the military itself that ended the war.

[–] flipht@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

There's a great documentary covering the protests from within the military called "Sir, No! Sir"

[–] Night@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hypothetically speaking, what in your opinion would be the odds nowadays for those who oppose the draft and those who comply with the pro-war narrative?

How much would such a situation escalate domestically?

[–] suction@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

Sigh. You can’t escape the lame 4chan comedians anywhere, I guess.

[–] datendefekt@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What does a rotary engine sound like? A Mazda, that's what. Ugh, that triggered me more than it should.

[–] lte678@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm a little confused, aren't they just referring to aircraft rotary engines with the cylinders arranged radially? Or what's the triggering part?

[–] GlitchyDigiBun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Rotors are lifting blades for helicopters. They're mounted to the rotary engine.

[–] Yendor@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In any modern helicopter, the rotors are mounted to a turbo-prop engine - which is a turbine, not a rotary engine.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Turboshaft*.

[–] lte678@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Rotary engines were never used for helicopters AFAIK. Maybe there are some niche designs

[–] datendefekt@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Rotary engines are wankel engines, which are only used by Mazda in their cars. If the cylinders are arranged radially it's called a radial engine. IIRC, one of the very few helicopters to have a radial motor was the Sikorsky S-58, which saw action in the Vietnam War. But generally pretty much all helicopters have turbines.

[–] lte678@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yup, I know, it doesnt check out at all, you wouldn't put a rotary on a helicoptor. But "rotary" engines were indeed used on aircraft, since they also refer to a radial cylinder configuration where the engine housing moves and the axis is fixed. So I think it's likely they were referring to the common WWI plane engine. I didnt think of a wankel at all till you mentioned it! Interestingly enough, modern wankel engines are also sold for helicopters.

[–] pinkwerdo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Aren't helicopters sometimes called rotary winged aircraft?

[–] Afrazzle@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

More like anon predicts battlebit

[–] Xperr7@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

did this come true

[–] Umbra@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago