this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
190 points (98.5% liked)

News

23296 readers
3472 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Before indicting Donald Trump last year for allegedly mishandling classified documents, federal prosecutors had to decide where to bring the charges: Washington, DC, or Florida.

Ultimately, they charged the former president in Florida, a decision that has proven to be a fateful one — underscored by the vastly different approaches taken by DC judges as compared to the federal judge now presiding over the criminal case in Florida.

Those approaches became apparent in the past week as opinions were unsealed from two DC federal judges indicating how much more quickly and harshly for Trump the case might have played out had it remained in Washington.

Bradley Moss, a DC-based lawyer with extensive national security experience, said that the ruling from Howell provided Cannon a “clear road map” to consider the attorney-client privilege issues.

But Cannon hasn’t even scheduled a hearing on the topic, which the parties began arguing over in court papers in February.

“That she continues to sit on the matter is inexcusable,” Moss said.

all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 60 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

But the Justice Department moved the investigation to a Miami grand jury in its final few weeks before charging Trump in South Florida’s federal court because much of Trump’s allegedly criminal actions took place at Mar-a-Lago, in Palm Beach, Florida.

Prosecutors have publicly disclosed little about the choice to move the case to Florida, though it has become a topic of discussion in the fights with the defense teams over secrecy, especially at a recent hearing before Cannon. “I can say that the investigation that was ongoing before the DC grand jury had – had adequate nexus to continue in Washington. I’m not prepared to comment on the date on which a decision to charge in Florida was made or what the internal deliberations were on that subject,” special counsel’s office prosecutor David Harbach told Cannon at a hearing last week.

It was always a messy situation. Factors I'm sure Smith's team considered in charging in FL:

  • They needed (under existing law) to charge Trump at the location that there was a nexus to the crime, but also needed personal jurisdiction or to extradite him for purposes of trial back to DC, which maybe they didn't feel they could defend.
  • If Trump was charged in DC and Trump's lawyers wanted to delay, initial motions to move the proceeding to Florida would have already caused delays.
  • Finally, because Smith certainly predicted Trump would claim the documents were declassified as part of official conduct, charging in the place where he lives now as a simple citizen (Florida) prevents Trump from exploiting the case location (DC) as evidence they are prosecuting conduct related to his presidency.

They probably also thought the case was cut-and-dry enough that the location truly wouldn't matter. But even so, they were not nearly cynical enough about Aileen Cannon and how badly it could go when she's basically Trump's pro bono counsel. Everyone who had seen Cannon's earlier rulings and confirmation proceedings knew she has zero integrity and was going to throw the case for Trump.

Like usual, it seems like nobody in official positions planned properly for what happens with an actual bad-faith actor in control.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

They didn’t know which of the 18 district judges they would get by moving the case to the southern district of Florida. She was assigned by a random software selection process, standardly used for cases such as these. He just got extremely lucky.

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/06/12/judge-aileen-cannon-trump-documents-case-00101641

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago (2 children)

This is how I know that either (1) God doesn't exist or (2) if he does, he has a sick sense of humor.

Just read the Bible; God is an absolute cunt.

[–] PlasticExistence@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

I vote sick sense of humor

Yes, that's another good point. They played the odds.

I don't know if they factored it as "1 in 18 chance we get delayed until election" or thought Cannon would maintain some semblance of objectivity even if they got her, but it probably helped reassure them to roll the dice in Florida.

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's not like it matters either way, SCOTUS is going to block anything from happening to him.

In the end all this will be is a ratings goose for cable news.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 5 months ago

Oh I don't know, I'm pretty sure it also deeply impacts our national security.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 9 points 5 months ago

Anyone that thinks they were genuinely surprised that Cannon is doing what she is doing is part of the problem.

Wake up, fool.