this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
302 points (96.3% liked)

World News

39023 readers
2363 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Two decades of U.S. policy appear to be rooted in a mistaken understanding of what happened that day. archive

(page 2) 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kbin_space_program@kbin.run 3 points 5 months ago (5 children)

This isn't new. Also, this is a false narrative that the invasion of Iraq was ever about retribution for 9/11.

It was started because the Dubya administration insisted that Iraq had WMDs and implied that Saddam was planning on using them relatively soon

[–] xapr@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 months ago

WMDs was one of the excuses for invading Iraq. Another was that they hosted Al Qaeda people in the country. The administration started claiming Saddam Hussein was somehow involved in the 9/11 attacks within a couple of days. Here's just one article I found from a quick search: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/9-11-and-iraq-the-making-of-a-tragedy/

[–] Paraponera_clavata@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Not my claim that it's new, I copy pasted the article

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (3 children)

That was clear to me from a few days after the attacks. Some called me conspiracy nut for that. Good to see that someone finally dug up the truth. You simply cannot trust those Saudi buggers. They smile and hug you, just to drive a knife in your back.

Always keep in mind that we are unbelievers and heathens for them and that it is absolutely OK for them to betray and deceive us.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Well the Royal family does some F'ed up stuff. Like having journalist sawed into pieces while still alive.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›