this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
28 points (78.0% liked)

Work Reform

10009 readers
320 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This article is quite light on details. Is this anything new, or just people looking for easy, flexible jobs with a different name?

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

A content creator says

I stopped reading there (and not just because I can't close the fucking popup)

[–] Scew@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

It's a prop to promote whoever-she-is's tik-tok channel. If you haven't been looking out for yourself and constantly overwork yourself... no shit you shouldn't be doing that. Anyone who's worked is attempting to optimize less work for more pay. My distaste is for the article, btw. To address your question, it's just rebranding like you suggested. Why come up with something new when you have the next generation's social media app and all the ideas that worked on your generation to fuel the channel?

[–] Duchess@yiffit.net 5 points 1 year ago

i don't see how it's a revolutionary idea that you work based on the wage you're paid. i get a low wage so i do very little work. i'm trying to get anything better paid but for now i'm giving exactly as much effort as a low wage job requires.

[–] mo_ztt@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

So... I've dealt with people who take this girl's approach to their work, when their work getting done well was necessary for something I needed, and I definitely didn't like it. I also think this girl in the article is extremely at risk of having her job replaced by an AI and winding up behind the 8 ball when that happens and the market gets that much more challenging.

That said, for as bad as it is, I think this is actually closer to the answer than is everyone working for Amazon and peeing in bottles and $26k per year and no health insurance.

load more comments
view more: next ›