this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
129 points (96.4% liked)

Linux

48216 readers
701 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

new to this linux stuff sorry

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Joker@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Linux is Linux. The differences largely come down to packaging and release cadence. You never really have upgrade difficulties with Arch due to the rolling release model as long as you are updating pretty regularly. On other distros, it’s not uncommon to deal with release upgrades that can be a little more involved. The other advantage to Arch is the repository and AUR. You can install just about anything with one command/click.

Personally, I think Arch is the easiest distro to use once it’s installed. I was a Debian user before Arch for mostly the same reason - it’s so easy to install software because the repository is huge. Being on Mint, you have access to a lot. Just imagine having access to even more but needing a little more knowledge to get started and that’s Arch.

[–] shapis@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

More of the software I use is in the repos/aur compared to debian. Which makes everything easier.

[–] outhold@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[–] 20watts@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Customization, lots of apps (via aur), no bloat

[–] JoelJ@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just to chime in, I first tried arch because some youtuber I followed recommended it, but after 5 years I would say I've stayed with it for the AUR and the community. The AUR has almost every app I've ever needed, and whenever I have a problem there's always a solution on one forum or another, to the point where I can usually just copy and paste it into the terminal and it's solved!

[–] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

AUR is kind of the worst feature Arch offers and I am not actively using Arch right now anyway. Because its used for the wrong purpose: "install any app you need/want". Thats dangerous and creates problems by itself. I'd rather rely on flatpak/appimages, but open for counter arguments.

[–] JoelJ@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What problems does the AUR create? I just install using yay, and it mostly works fine

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RiikkaTheIcePrincess@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So much this! As a user of both Arch and Gentoo I say, don't use Arch as Gentoo! It's not Gentoo! AUR is not a standard repository and there's a reason they make you jump through hoops just to use the thing.

Also, it's a total pain when normal package management is quick and easy. The building alone is weird in Arch and somehow like 60% of the crap I try to build from AUR fails hard and I just can't be bothered to spend more than like twenty minutes tweaking on it. Gr. 😅

(Aaalllsooo, apparently lots of people break their Arch installs using the AUR like it's a normal repo and then wonder why Arch is so crap and leave.)

[–] JoelJ@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

What do you mean by 'normal' package management?

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 1 points 1 year ago
[–] Furycd001@fosstodon.org 1 points 1 year ago

@jackpot For me personally, I've found that XFCE on Arch runs faster & uses less resources compared to XFCE running on mint, Debian, or Ubuntu. Debian will always be my No.1 fav Linux distro, but for now I'm on Arch, even if I'm not really using the aur for anything other than nvidia drivers. Arch probably won't be permanent, but for now I'm loving it, & switching back to Debian will eventually happen. Just not yet....

[–] Oha@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago
[–] AlmightySnoo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Arch and Gentoo have IMO the best documentation ever and you learn a lot when you try using either of those distributions as you have to do everything from scratch starting from a minimal system. Since you're saying you're new to Linux though, I'd say you should start with something more user-friendly like Mint or Ubuntu (or even Manjaro if you want a rolling release distro) and stay away from Arch and Gentoo in the beginning.

[–] art@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Arch teaches you about the inner workings of Linux. Mostly because it breaks all the time and you have to fix it.

[–] TempusNemini@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I have 5 computers with Arch (iMac, 2 macBooks, new Asus and ooooold storage box). How long it takes for something to break up?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] warmaster@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I use Crystal Linux, which is Arch based.

I've tried Mint along with 10 other distros. What I liked about Arch is:

  • Latest Kernel, always. This means new drivers, better support for your current devices and support for more devices. Security & performance patches.
  • AUR. Massive repo of user submitted apps & libs most not found elsewhere.
  • Arch WiKi. Everything you will need or want to do somebody else already did and documented it so everyone else can have a guide to do it. Best documentation site ever.
  • Arch Repo. Always the latest Software. Officially maintained apps and libs land first on Arch, Debian & Ubuntu derivatives take ages to catch up in comparison.
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›