this post was submitted on 10 May 2024
303 points (92.2% liked)

Anarchist Memes

1180 readers
1 users here now

This forum is for anarchists to circlejerk and share zesty memes

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lugal@lemmy.ml 41 points 5 months ago

You forgot to mention that they violently took an empty house no one used but the owner wanted it to be empty

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago (3 children)

As much as I agree that “civilized society” spouted by right-wingers is awfully damn far from it it seems kinda weird to act like anarchy would bring about a structured society.

All large groups who don’t want to end up falling into disparate groups led by the nearest psychopath and trauma-fueled meat-heads are going to need structure. Yes, capitalism and the right in general have failed but that doesn’t mean government is bad(or even difficult).

[–] lugal@lemmy.ml 23 points 5 months ago

Anarchism isn't the absence of structure but the absence of hierarchy. The most basic idea of anarchist decision making is a council free for everyone to join that tries to find consensus.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Anarchists aren't against all government at all cost, but about having the bare minimum authority to do so. It is about not enshrining positions of power that those psychopaths then go on to seek and jerrymander in to place. It is about creating structures where no one is actually above others even if they're deciding some things for others.

Like how most people trust a good tradesman to do their job and don't dictate the trade to the tradesman (the ones that want a good job done anyways!). Everything requires a minimum of trust. Would you let a plumber in to your home you don't trust? Why do we allow police and politicians that few trust?

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That’s not anarchy, that’s just wanting a different system of government but expecting it to come with dramatic fanfare and the naive trust that good people will fill the power vacuums. It takes work, and that’s hard, but that’s the only way it’s going to work.

And you’re right, why do we allow it? We could vote for better people, obviously, but we don’t. Many people have been working on this problem for a long time.

We will always fall back to a government system of some kind. You can tear down the current one and pretend that the job will be done or you can actually work to make the stupid thing work.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Anarchism is a diverse political movement with many strains of thought and centuries of theory and attempts to implement it. Lemmy isn’t going to teach you nearly as much about it as Peter Kropotkin or any of the anarchist led organizations and movements out there. We aren’t naive idealists, we run organizations much more frequently than state communists actually. We fight fascists. We’re probably actually the healthiest far left movement when it comes to actually doing shit in America. You just don’t see it because it’s easy to miss that a good giveaway or a books to prisoners program or a bike co-op is anarchist.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

it seems kinda weird to act like anarchy would bring about a structured society

This isn't exactly what the comic portrays though. If you're thinking of "anarchy" as being the absence of government, it isn't anarchy itself that would lead to a structured society, it's the intentional efforts of people to build a society sans government that is structured on things other than property and institutional violence.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The idea of government does not require property and institutional violence. If that’s where we’re starting from then there’s not going to be much of a conversation to be had.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago

Why not? It sounds like you have a specific idea of what these words mean to you, but if those are very different from what people identifying as anarchists are talking about, it doesn't seem like there is much point objecting on the basis of your preferred definitions, that's basically just a strawman argument.

[–] LoveSausage@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

To me this shows the problem with anarchism. It's a reason anarchism is the somewhat acceptable protestation. In the mean time others are working on actually takeover use the No1 weapon avvailable, the state. /Anarchist in the street, ML in the sheets

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (3 children)

The state is a corrupting force. It’s using the ring to fight Sauron. You can use it at times, but to seize it or accept its right to exist even temporarily gives room for those interested in power to seize your movement and they will never let go. Add in power corrupting even the good and you’ve got problems brewing.

We will be as the weeds. And we will fill the holes an unjust society leaves, cracking the concrete and overrunning their manicured lawns. A decentralized movement cannot be extinguished without removing the conditions that allow it to thrive. It cannot be subverted or taken over. It has its weaknesses, but I don’t trust the people’s stick to beat my neighbors either.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Epicmulch@lemm.ee 5 points 5 months ago

I'm 13 and this is deep.

load more comments
view more: next ›