Personally I think the first transfer via the portal should be free, but any subsequent transfers should cost a year of eligibility, like the old system. They'd still have the ability to move around if needed, but it'd give some actual consequence to hopping around from school to school on a whim.
this post was submitted on 07 May 2024
6 points (87.5% liked)
College Football
842 readers
7 users here now
A community to discuss college football.
| /c/CFB Poll Top 25 |  |
|---|---|
| 1. Oregon |  |
| 2. Ohio State |  |
| 3. Indiana |  |
| 4. Texas |  |
| 5. Notre Dame |  |
| T-6. Ole Miss |  |
| T-6. Tennessee |  |
| 8. Penn State |  |
| 9. Alabama |  |
| 10. BYU |  |
| 11. Miami |  |
| 12. SMU |  |
| 13. Georgia |  |
| 14. Boise State |  |
| 15. Army |  |
| 16. Texas A&M |  |
| 17. Clemson |  |
| 18. South Carolina |  |
| 19. Washington State |  |
| 20. Colorado |  |
| 21. Louisville |  |
| 22. Tulane |  |
| 23. Kansas State |  |
| T-24. Iowa State |  |
| T-24. LSU |  |
Check out our other sports communities!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
As a competitive measure, that's not a bad solution, but the issue always boils down to what does college football demand from a player in return for their scholarship, etc. It's effectively a job, and if the amateurism horse hasn't bolted, then the door is hanging on by like one rusty bolt, so the NCAA can't (and really... shouldn't) try to reel it back in towards the old days.
I think there are smart enough people involved that you can save the non-revenue sports that the schools would like to save, and most full-ride athletes will have a market value that's very well served by living expenses and a tuition waiver. Just rip off the bandaid with football and basketball.
Player allegiance is to their team most of the time, not a school, not a geographical region, not a fan base. If a leader who was a substantial part of what made the team "the team", then players should be able to go search out a new team.
Coaches contracts have managed to work this out. They stick out their contract or they pay (or get their next school to pay). Schools keep coaches to end of contract or they pay.
I don't want to see players limited in ways coaches aren't. They only get a few years to play college ball, while coaches get decades. Let the players take their best shots. It's crazy now because it's new, things will settle down after a couple seasons. Maybe NIL contracts start looking different to encourage players to stick around 3+ years.
I think fan investment is still part of the equation. It may not be as important to recruits as say money (and we can argue the merits of fiscal vs spiritual/emotional compensation all day long), but it still means something to say that 100,000 people may be chanting your name some day. I think that if fans want to continue to have any sort of impact, even if small compared to the "good ole days" they need to be extra vocal on social media. This of course will bring out the worst of a fan base (cough cough vol twitter) so it's a double edged sword. As an aside, I find payments made or garunteed upon graduation a tough pill to swallow, though I think there is merit to the idea.