104
Added Bugs to Keep my job
(sh.itjust.works)
"various changes"
Initial commit
I have on multiple occasions done a much more verbose variant of that: "I genuinely cannot remember what I changed"
Fix tpyo
"Improve performance by removing a function that never did anything" the story of my life
"Eigentlich fertig" was for an IP subnet calculator that I programmed with a fellow student
Und uneigentlich? :D
"If you are reading this, you are in the wrong branch."
“i cant believe this works i think”
"idk what happened but it works fine now"
"Updated README"
"fixed"
"Forgot to commit changes lol"
I also apparently forgot append was a thing
I'm ashamed... It's simply "bump deps"
Did I also touch some code and tests connected to dependency updates. Yes.
Did I document any of that? No.
Did I spend more time writing this comment the thinking about the commit. Most definitely.
Will I be bisecting to this commit after our next deploy and cursing at myself? Probably.
this is terrible, will rewrite later
"Added missing lifecycle blocks"
How am I supposed to do that I'm waiting for docker to rebuild my image to know if my new configuration fucks everything
- fixes #22
" "
wip
see #234
"push files"
(It's a personal repo for homework assignments)
"can still be better but priority changed"
Changes
"relearning c++ arrays again"
"fixed. whoops..."
merge staging
"TLDR..."
I'm kidding, my applications are so simple version control would be synonymous with entire rewrites as I lean new things.
...
"fix previous commit"
Notes
"Move from GitHub to Forgejo"
"formatting and typo"
"Added brew to list of accepted package managers"
From my "install all the things" script I host on github
"feat: replace every function in FunctionIdentifier with a single closure
My goal with less-function-id was to create a more neat solution but instead it turned into something far more ugly and limiting" You sometimes think a solutioniis good and neat until you implement it
scoping
PAPYRUSSSSSS!!!!
Refactor package structure
e12fa3b (HEAD -> main, origin/main) No
Fixes issues in PR
"src/utils/typing: added tests for isArray"
we have 90% coverage minimum
It was for work so I can't check right now (Gitlab which is only accessible on LAN), but it was something like "updated README.MD"
“Expanded unit test to cover new functionality” true story
this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
104 points (86.6% liked)
Programmer Humor
30944 readers
195 users here now
Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)
Rules:
- Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
- No NSFW content.
- Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS