this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
193 points (94.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

9626 readers
824 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I listened to the episode, and its genuinly horrifying how big auto's pushing of bigger and bigger cars just keeps killing, and the majority of people seem to go "eh, thats just the way it is"

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Turkey_Titty_city@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago

Bigger cars are more profitable. Small cars are not.

The average full size suv buying price is 80K. the average car buying price is like 30K.

this is also the same reason new starter homes are like 3000 sq ft today. and one from 30 years ago were 2000 sq ft.

the cost to produce a huge suv is not much more than it is to produce a small car, but the suv is commands 2-3x the price of the small car.

[–] Octagon9561@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There are people who are afraid of flying, no disrespect to them, but I'd literally feel safer being on a 50 year old plane operated by a third world airline every single day than having to cross the street even once a week. I bet statistically, it actually is safer.

[–] showmustgo@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Look at this behemoth. People drive this so that they can't even see the poors walking about.

Whoops meant to reply to op

[–] stupidillusion@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Say, is that the new Canyonero?

[–] ZebraFerret@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I always hear "statistically you have a higher chance of a plane crashing on you than you crashing while in a plane." So you're probably onto something there.

[–] mothringer@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"statistically you have a higher chance of a plane crashing on you than you crashing while in a plane."

Where are you hearing that, and I'm almost certain it's not true? On the other hand, "you're more likely to die driving to the airport than on your flight" actually is true.

That can’t be right, can it? Lots of people are on planes and probably the average person takes more than one flight.

That cant be true. A plane has at least one person in it.

[–] ech0@lemdro.id 3 points 1 year ago

Well that's a crock of shit. Probably some BS marketing an Airliner came up with. How often do you hear about a pedestrian being hit by a plane?

[–] RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago
[–] azdood85@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I literally need a bigger vehicle to protect me from the other assholes with big vehicles.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Road designs are horrible, and everyone wants to buy hummer-sized SUVs and Trucks. What do you expect?

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yet we Americans are terrified of gun violence. Shitting our pants, shitting out useless laws. About the same number of people are killed each year by vehicles (fluctuates a bit). Where's the outrage? Where are the calls for "common sense" legislation? The contrast is interesting.

But here's the rub, I can stay away from dangerous people, situations and areas. I can also choose not to blow my brains out (that's always near half of gun deaths).

But I don't have much choice but to travel by vehicle. Or walk around. (Dear friend was just killed crossing the street.) Had a few people I know die from car wrecks, or damned close, including myself. How many people you know been shot? I don't know one. Yes, that's anecdotal, but I'd guess our collective experience is much the same.

It's the randomness that people fear. Justifiably! I get it.

How about sitting in my living room? Or bedroom? Poor guy at the end of the block has had TWO vehicles in his living room! How many pics have we seen of cars crashing into homes? So many that they barely make the news. (You can say the same about bullets!) Talk about random death coming at you! Yet we never talk about the vehicle "arms race".

"Guns shouldn't be an accepted part of life!"

Aight. Neither should vehicular death.

"No one should have an assault weapon!"

Aight. No one should be driving a SUV tank.

And please, let's dial in the, "I HAVE to have a vehicle/gun." I can argue both all night, and I can argue BOTH sides. I can also argue "perfect world" scenarios. Neither are interesting nor new topics. We're not going to make either illegal, so what now? Hell of a question.

load more comments
view more: next ›