Of course then when you ask how tall a bicycle is they'll tell you it's about as tall as a deer. Damn useless
this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
804 points (96.9% liked)
memes
10310 readers
2138 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
About... yea high. Like, two dozen hamburgers.
So what you're saying is, I can make 800 venison hamburgers from a single deer? Nice.
If you like eating every single piece, guts, brains, bones and all, sure go for it 👍
Hey if you grind the bone fine enough you can't tell and it is a great source of calcium.
You might have noticed. It's kind of our thing, doing things differently from the rest of the world for no good reason.
Different measuring system
Different cars
Different health care system
Different social ethics
Different system of government
Very few trains
We're just a bunch of silly dumbasses here.
I mean there is a good reason.... And that reason is, which I will state in this comment, is that the reason is very good in terms of the fact that hereby unto forthwith hence that reason is valid.
load more comments
(2 replies)
you people still don't use metric time.
To be fair: if anyone's going to intuitively know the weight of 800 hamburgers, Americans are it. :)
Also, I'm not entirely opposed to using "every day" analogies for stuff like this.
load more comments
(3 replies)