this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
-8 points (43.1% liked)

politics

19107 readers
2910 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 29 points 6 months ago (2 children)

James Carville should shut the fuck up... Young voters should vote - definitely... but this asshole is responsible for the political strategies that landed us Biden as a candidate and lost an election to Trump.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Eh, I’d argue Debbie Wasserman-Shultz focusing on Hillary and intentionally keeping Bernie out of the spotlight was more to blame for Trump’s first term. There’s really no way to tell at this point though. Regardless, we agree that Carville is a dumbass.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

That and Clinton skipping campaigning in Michigan and Wisconsin and mouthing off about coal in West Virginia, next door to coal heavy Pennsylvania.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 2 points 6 months ago

There was a whole crew of six-figure idiots from the DNC that all got together and decided that Debbie Wasserman-Shultz should be in charge. Carville's right up there with them; he was furious at the idea of having Obama instead of Hillary Clinton, and he wanted to skip the primaries entirely and just have Nancy Pelosi pick all the candidates. He's a full-blown loony. And a dumbass yes. I'm genuinely very surprised that he's managed to say something that I so fully agree with.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

I mean, he married a republican strategist, and there’s definitely some fails there but I don’t know that I’d blame the vast string of milquetoast kakhi-wearing hair-model losers the DNCC teed up for several decades on him.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (12 children)

“So, I hear this a lot,” began Carville. “‘James, young voters are just not into this. It’s two candidates, one’s in their 80s, one is almost in their 80s, they’re concerned about things that Washington politicians, and you just can’t blame them for-‘ Oh, shit. Fuck you!”

“If Trump and [John] Roberts and Alito and [Neil] Gorsuch and [Clarence] Thomas and Leonard Leo and the Heritage Foundation, if they get a hold, there will be no government left, there will be no rights left, you will live under theocracy, you’ll end up with Christian nationalism. But that’s all right, you little fucking 26-year-old, you don’t feel like ‘the election’s important to me. They’re not addressing the issues that I care about,'” said Carville.

Carville concluded by advising the press and Democratic operatives “to tell these young people to get off your motherfucking ass and go vote because you should vote like your entire future and the entire future of this United States depends on it because quite frankly, it does — and that’s not an exaggeration.”

I never thought that in my life me and James Carville would see exactly eye-to-eye on things, but there you go. IDK if talking this way is tactically productive, but he's not wrong. They should have this guy intervene in every newscast about how Trump's ahead 3:1 among first-time Wisconsin voters with odd numbered license plates or whatever, to yell "Fuck you!" at the anchors with little bits of spittle flecked around his mouth.

[–] TheBananaKing@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (3 children)

It's the candidate's job to serve the will of the people, not the other way around.

If you want people to vote for you, you have to do the things the people demand. Like, oh, say, not enabling and funding genocide.

If it's super mega omg important that people vote for you, then it's on you to you do those things really hard.

If you consider the principle of democracy valid, then whatever the voters choose is correct by definition.

And by the same token, if they don't vote for you, you have only yourself to blame.

That's the game. Don't like it, don't play.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (10 children)

This is just a weird paternalistic point of view to me.

It is absolutely true that rich abusive criminals are in charge of the country, doing all kinds of horrifying stuff. You can put Biden in that category if you want; at least as far as Gaza is concerned I won't really fight you on the classification.

Sitting back and waiting like "well it's on them to fix it, and until then I won't take steps that will change the outcome to one that's better" is absolutely guaranteed to fail. If you want things to be better, work for better outcomes. That is the only way it will ever happen.

You wanna work for better outcomes in Gaza? Fuckin a man that sounds great, tell me how. You wanna give Biden a hard time about Gaza? Fuckin a man sounds great.

You wanna commit to sitting out and not taking positive steps until something changes from above to make it worth your while? If that's your choice, then buckle the fuck up, because I think there's a definite possibility that you might get a chance to firsthand experience how much worse than present-day reality it can get if enough people do that.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

These are great ideals. Let’s come back to reality. For every person that doesn’t vote, they are tacitly voting for Trump. I’m going to have to throw hands when they take my healthcare away. Please don’t make me have to throw hands. I’m not saying you, but rather the oppressors.

[–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Pretty sure they don't tally up all the people who didn't vote and add it to Trump's total. If Trump wins you want to be mad, be mad at the people who voted for him.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah that’s not how it works in a first-past-the-post election. Like we do. RepubliQans cheat, and they vote in lock-step. It’s a law. Massive D turnout is the only way to win.

This is why the whole “biden bad me no vote” is also a russian troll talking point. It’s a happy circumstance for them.

[–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 3 points 6 months ago

For the record, I'm an advocate for everyone voting. Everyone should vote for who they want to represent them.

But that doesn't change what I said. People who didn't vote for Trump aren't the ones responsible for Trump winning an election. Thinking otherwise is just backwards

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

enabling and funding genocide.

Israel and the US have been strategic allies since the 1960s. There aren't any (and won't ever be any) American politician who won't honor that. I'd bet my last dollar you'd call any and all military aide "GeNoCiDe SuPpOrT". Ie, you'll hate any us political option. So what's the point? Just say "nuke the us" and move along.

This ain't my war, and just like all the others I've seen I don't like it. You can't stop it anymore than anyone else so stop slinging mud.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Yeah, kids should recognize how fucked up our government is and lower their expectations. This is why we need more civics education: So we know exactly how little our government is capable of.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago

"Okay, Boomer." is the only acceptable response here.

lets not forget, that he- and the "old school" democrats are a large part of why we're in the place we are. They like sharing power with the pubies. they have more power that way than they would have if they didn't. Not saying that leftism is popular... but voters are still more progressive than this guy is.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

“The Supreme Court has out of nothing getting ready to create immunity for one person, Donald Trump. Now, I am hardly a scholar of the American Revolution and the founding, but I do know this: One of the principles of the founding of the United States of America was that no person was above the law,” argued Carville, before calling the originalist wing of the Supreme Court “illegitimate whores” for asking questions during oral arguments in Trump’s immunity case last week.

I hate agreeing with James Carville. But I hear him. This is Serious As Fuck.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That's the neat part: It's always the most important election of our lives. It's always defending democracy and harm reduction. It's exhausting.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

It wasn’t always. Just since the right lost they damned minds.

[–] sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

nothing is as persuasive as being sworn at. Just usually not in the way people think it's persuasive.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

This is Carville. You get what you get, and sometimes its really good. And sometimes its just really loud nothing.

[–] paysrenttobirds@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Old white man screaming get off my lawn or were all going to die is not a great look.

He doesn't actually say anything about young voters other than acknowledging the party has ignored them, even knowing it needs their votes. Big torch.

Vote, tho

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 1 points 6 months ago

I would even go so far as to say the party has abused and relied on the excuse "they're worse than we are" to the point of failure. Even the last few elections a popular stance is to go full reverse logic and let things burn down because the "better" side doesn't care about the people either vs. the position of power. And I'm finding it hard to argue against them.

Locally, get informed about real choices (hopefully) or even get those choices to run, and vote. That is what makes the difference for things that affect you directly. The national scene is all but a lost cause though. The ones who could start to fix the inherit problems within are the ones benefiting from the status quo.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

"Plesse vote for the guys who are my friends," says raging geriatric on a cable news.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 1 points 6 months ago

*on a podcast from his living room swaying unhinged-ly back and forth

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'd bet my next paycheck that James carville smells like onions all the time

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

He sure sounds like he's got one tied to his belt

[–] JesterIzDead@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

His main issue is trying to appeal to young voters. They overwhelmingly don’t vote, they just bitch afterwards when it doesn’t go the way they wanted it to.

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

is this guys name supposed to mean something?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

Yeah, its a politics thing.

Don't worry about it.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Coprolite carville can fuck right off.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

"anything is a dildo if your brave enough. Including petrified shit."

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Uh. . .huh. Well alrighty then.

load more comments
view more: next ›