this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
173 points (94.4% liked)

politics

19089 readers
4335 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] shortwavesurfer@monero.town 56 points 6 months ago (10 children)

Honestly, we see where banning things gets us. Millions of people in prison and or killed over these things because there's black markets for them because people want them.

[–] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 31 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Or y’know ban the sale and don’t criminalise it?

Funny how a lot of countries are starting to crack down on cigarettes and the health issues they pose without mass locking people up.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 21 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Even if you do that you risk creating a black market that will be served by organised crime. In Australia it's an issue where tobacco shops get firebombed, and that's with just expensive cigarettes, not outright bans.

[–] evranch@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Here in Canada, we have a loophole in the law where indigenous have the right to use tobacco without taxation due to tradition. Which is totally fair - but it also applies to modern mass produced cigarettes for some reason.

As a result of ever increasing taxes on tobacco, I would reckon that at this point 80% of cigarettes smoked in my community have been smuggled off of a reserve. The black market is booming with "Rez smokes" selling for $5-10 a pack while legal cigs go for ~$30.

The federal government recently introduced a regulation mandating a health warning printed on every cigarette. Most agree it's a transparent attempt for the police to spot an illegal smoke in your hand, as Rez smokes don't have warnings on them. They are losing a ton of revenue to the black market, and are trying to crack down with heavy fines for even possessing a pack off of a reserve.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

So glad this meme isn't going to become useless.

[–] Kowowow@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago

Brother's outside smokin on a new port

Heard about his sister headed to the forecourt

Ran right over the dude from the shoe store

Rumored that he jumped down two floors, ooh, Lord!

Came right up behind him

The kid didn't see him

I never seen that look on another human being

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 9 points 6 months ago (16 children)
[–] 99shugz@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Someone get this man into the White House!

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I’d be a lefty dictator.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

For the proletariat, right?!??

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago

They would nickname me Robin Hood, prince of the guillotine

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

As per moderator request, a unique comment for yall. Enjoy.


Screw the prohibitionists.

There will come a moment when humanity triumphs over the war on drugs, granting individuals the autonomy to decide what substances they consume.

And when that day arrives… will you witness drug users discriminating against those who choose sobriety?

Will you observe prisons constructed for those who opt to remain drug-free?

Will individuals be branded as criminals for abstaining from substances?

Will drug users advocate for the militarization of law enforcement and the erosion of our constitutional rights in an attempt to impose their lifestyle on others?

NO.

Who would inflict such harm on others? Prohibitionists.

And we stand against them.

Legalizing marijuana alone won't address the most severe repercussions of the war on drugs.

Full legalization of all substances is the ultimate harm reduction strategy.

load more comments
view more: next ›