this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
828 points (97.6% liked)

Open Source

31371 readers
56 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

MS-DOS 1.25, 2.0 were release years ago, your title should specify 4.0

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)
[–] mac@infosec.pub 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

That page is full of pop-ups.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HowMany@lemmy.ml 8 points 7 months ago

Wake me when they release DOS 6.x source code.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Did they use source control of any kind back then?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] theshatterstone54@feddit.uk 5 points 7 months ago

Ah, the Quick and Dirty Operating System.... we meet again.

[–] Murdoc@sh.itjust.works 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

~~So not 3? Why not, because it was the most successful or something? 🤷~~

~~Plus I never even heard of 4 before. I'm going to have to look that up.~~

Bah, I was thinking of windows. I need to get some sleep.

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

As far as Windows goes, 95 was actually version 4.00.950 for the first version.

98 was 4.1, 2000 was 5.0, XP 5.1, Vista 6.0, 7 was 6.1, 8 was 6.2, 8.1 = 6.3

Then they jumped to 10 in both the name and internal version.

Windows 11 is still 10.0.x though.

[–] leanleft@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago (6 children)
[–] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 5 points 7 months ago

That is different source code, doing way more.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›