this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
177 points (100.0% liked)

Games

16690 readers
607 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BunkerBuster@lemmy.world 96 points 6 months ago

At What Point Do You Abandon A Live Roadmap?

Sometime during the design phase if you ask me.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 83 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

I genuinely hope we are not headed toward significant layoffs over there as a result of this game.

Warner Bros. having the artists take the L for management's poor decisions? They should be safe, that's totally not gonna happen /s

200-300 active players seems to be gamers' collective signal of, "fuck you for putting in stupid microtransaction live-service grindfests, you removed what makes games worth playing, so we ain't playin' them". Payday 3 is around the same level.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 26 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Remember kids: Management will never risk a damn thing and even when they do lose they’ll be ok because they put all your money into a rainy fund. And they’ll blame every single person but themselves.

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 5 points 6 months ago

I think the employees should get all the profits from the business, since they take on all the risk.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'd wager that's the floor because a non-trivial portion of that 2-300 are bots or something.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago

Yeah, it could be the people that launch every game in their library once a day for cards or something.

[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 65 points 6 months ago (2 children)

🖕Live Service🖕

It's not the dev's fault, they make what they're told to make. But the President of media enshittifier MAXHBODISCOVERYDUOPOLY has stated that is what they will continue to force feed us in lieu of content we purchase to then enjoy full stop.

[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 19 points 6 months ago

Yeah, and he had the gall to say that after Suicide Squad flopped. Guy legitimately looked at suicide squad and Hogwarts Legacy, and decided that more games like suicide squad should be their focus.

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 2 points 6 months ago

Video games aren't a duopoly. There's lots of great indie games coming out. I just started playing The Talos Principle 2, which came out this year. Helldivers is from what I hear a smashing success, and Hades 2 is coming out soon!

[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 29 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

When a dev abandon a live service game, I hope they do what Marvel's Avengers did: patch the game to work offline, unlock all paid contents, then has one final big discount before shutting everything off.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

this is owned by WB, the same company that canned a 90% complete film where the lead was posting pictures on instagram with a face that said

This film is hell to shoot, but it will all be worth it when it gets released.