this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
21 points (92.0% liked)

Reddit

13624 readers
1 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] shortwavesurfer@monero.town 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Guess what's not down, because it's impossible for it to go down. That's right, Lemmy.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Sort of

If Lemmy.world has an issue it affects 90% of users

[–] shortwavesurfer@monero.town 2 points 6 months ago

That's definitely true. And community moderators should consider at least trying to move their communities to smaller servers. Now that they've got some bigger subscriber numbers.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Not really. There are multiple instances which limits the chance. I assume some are able to access reddit too. Also, I've had more unreliability with Lemmy as its small servers and the code has often required restarts to fix issues.

Lemmy is fallible, just like anything else.

[–] shortwavesurfer@monero.town 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

What I mean is that since Lemmy is decentralized, the entire network can never be down. A few instances can be down, and your particular instance can be down, but the entirety of the network can never be down.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 0 points 6 months ago

The entire network can be down. Its just harder as there is some built in redundancy. I'm sure reddit also has built in redundancy.

When my local instance is down, I use my alternate. Its much worse as its not as curated. Sure, there are apps to help sync them now but my instance is now reliable enough that inhavmt bothered.

I think it's important to be realistic in the capabilities of Lemmy in looking at competing services.

[–] iamroot@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 6 months ago