#Introduction This community is dedicated to discussing topics around digital accessibility and disability rights. Please be respectful following the rules below.
#Guidelines No abusive, derogatory, or offensive posts or comments. No porn, gore, NSFW, or advertisements are allowed. Do not vendor spam accessibility products or events.
#Encourageent Please ask questions and share your experiences around digital accessibility and disability rights. Please be open to other views so we can engage in respectful dialogue.
#FYI I'm waiting to add an icon or badge until alt text can be added for them in Lemmy.
This requires being anti-ableist
Does being feminist require being anti-male? Does my view that black people are still suffering prejudice mean I need to be anti-white? Does my view that I'm equal to foreigners mean I need to be anti-british?
Honestly sounds like pointless shit stirring. If equality is all that matters, then that should be done by giving people with a disadvantage help, not by holding back people that don't have a disadvantage.
Ableist is defined as discrimination or prejudice against people with disabilities, especially physical disabilities. Supporting people of all different races and trying to end systemic racism would be about being anti-racist. Feminism is a little too broad for me to define but it would probably align with providing men and women equal rights. The goal is to unite people not divide. The issue is that most of the web is inaccessible and cannot be accessed by people with disabilities. Excluding a group of people from a building because of their gender, race, or disability is against the law. Yet, people with disabilities are excluded or lack access to information on publicly available websites each day. This type of change requires people to be anti-ableist and to do the work necessary to make their website accessible.