this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
40 points (97.6% liked)

Australia

3613 readers
100 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] min0nim@aussie.zone 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So, let's be honest here - producers artificially ramped up wholesale costs in the months before the new increases were handed down by the regulators (e.g. restrict supply through maintenance, and then unleash supply when the price is higher).

They can do this because the biggest ones are both on the retail and wholesale side. We're getting fucking fleeced.

[–] flathead@quex.cc 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Of course. Privatization of public utilities, particularly energy generation and distribution systems, is simply a transfer of common wealth to private. Fleecing people who don't understand the arcane pricing structures of "the market" they pretend is operating is just another revenue opportunity.

[–] macrocephalic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Privatisation can only work if there's true deregulation. This just isn't feasible for utilities as there's only one distribution system (and it would be stupid to have more) and the barrier to entry for wholesale is too much to truly allow competition.

[–] flathead@quex.cc 4 points 1 year ago

Full deregulation implies that speculators are free to create trading options. In most cases the major interests are capable of manipulating the traded commodity price via their control of supply. Also, as you point out, barriers to entry of utilities create a walled garden that shouldn't be handed over to an entity whose mission is to create profit and enrich its owners. Deregulation implies rolling back regulations often created in response to the excesses of an unregulated market.

[–] tuff_wizard@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago

Maybe we’re working under different assumptions but I can’t see how a private company with no regulation would do anything other than continue to try and maximise profits at the cost of everything and everyone around them.

I mean there was true deregulation in the first place. So many things went wrong that they had to start regulating things.

[–] crossover@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It’s the 30% supply charge increase that made me mad. That’s not tied to the wholesale cost. Thankfully I have solar panels so my bill is already quite low. But I still need grid access. Paying 30% extra now for that “luxury”.

[–] veroxii@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah every year I have to shop around for lowest connection cost. It goes up year on year. And it's definitely because of people with solar panels. A way to make them pay regardless of use.

load more comments
view more: next ›