this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2024

175 points (94.4% liked)

Technology

59298 readers

4665 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

175

X’s Premium users can no longer hide their blue checks (www.theverge.com)

submitted 7 months ago by misk@sopuli.xyz to c/technology@lemmy.world

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 25 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] neidu2@feddit.nl 112 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

I'd think that once you're at the level where you not only stick around in the dumpster fire, but also willingly give your money to this manchild, you lack the awareness needed to see how bad a blue checkmark looks on you anyway.

EDIT: I have been informed that some get the blue checkmark against their will and without paying. Just when you thought xitter couldn't get dumber...

[–] youngalfred@lemm.ee 59 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Iirc just recently they started giving out blue ticks to people with lots of followers, regardless of if they wanted it. Then this week they make it so you can't hide them. It seems like a dim move - piss off the people who bring lots of traffic to your website, but actively decided to not get a blue tick, by forcing the tick on them.
If they didn't leave beforehand, maybe this would make some people/orgs consider leaving?

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

He’s been forcing blue checks on people since the initial change - with Stephen King, for instance. Basically a way to promote the program and make it look like prominent people are paying, but also a confused mix with the previous verification checks.

[–] GardenVarietyAnxiety@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

It really does seem like he's -trying- to kill it

[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 8 points 7 months ago

Only other twitter users see the blue checkmark. The people who think it's dumb aren't around.

[+] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev -29 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

FYI: Blue checkmarks were a thing LONG before paying for blue checkmarks was a thing. In the end, I think most people who are making an issue out of this aren't even twitter users (let alone checkmark users) themselves.

[–] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 41 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Nobody is unaware of that. It's just that before Musk took over, the checkmark meant something completely different. What it means today is potentially embarrassing enough for people to want to hide it. Now they can't.

Before Musk the checkmark meant "This user's identity has been verified and they are notable enough to need that verification".

Today it means "This user pays for Twitter".

[–] drcobaltjedi@programming.dev 14 points 7 months ago

Seriously, I don't understand tgat person's point. Before elon the check ment "yes this really is Billy West, voice actor for a lot of things". It wasn't a hard concept.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

Yeah, but that was before PG changed what they meant and allowed fake verified users to damage real companies stock value (which I find funny AF), rendering the blue check meaningless and basically tuned it into a scarlet letter.

[–] Juice88@lemmy.world 79 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Wear your shame! lol

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 24 points 7 months ago

The online equivalent of a dunce cap.

[–] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 12 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

What the Xorg guys doin again?

Then read "blue checks".

Oh.

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago (3 children)

We could start a social network called UUayland and really confuse things.

[–] brunacho@scribe.disroot.org 5 points 7 months ago

Wayland.social beat you to it (:

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 months ago

UwUayland?

[–] onion@feddit.de 4 points 7 months ago

Χorg (With greek letter Chi)

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Die a moment there I thought you were talking about Jean-Baptiste Zorg.

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 4 points 7 months ago

Jean-Baptiste

Emmanuel

Zorg.

[–] foremanguy92_@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago

Okay... 🙃

[–] Caligvla@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I don't get it, what's so bad about blue checkmarks? I know you can "buy" them now, but what of it?

[–] kosanovskiy@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

Some beans were hiding it to avoid being scrutinized for paying into Elons platform.but still wanted to have their name, pretty much marketing and loosing money.

[–] elxeno@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think ppl with blue check shitting on elon and twitter were being called out for paying and supporting him.

[–] dontwakethetrees@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

People (rightfully) shitting on Elon were forcefully given blue checkmarks and now they can’t hide that mark so that it looks hypocritical.

[–] waratchess@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

They were being called 8 buck schmucks.

[–] theorangeninja@lemmy.today -4 points 7 months ago

Get the pitchforks!