Asklemmy

43746 readers

1277 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

123

Books that are worse than the film (which was already bad?) (lemmy.ml)

submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by tetris11@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

114 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've started reading Jumper by NameDoesNotMatter. I would like to formally apologise about all the harsh things I've ever spoken about that film.

Fine, the cast is unlikeable and the action scenes are just fisticuffs in the air, but my god, in comparison to the teenage dreck that is the book, it's a masterpiece. At least they tried to build a credible back story for the main character.

In the book, he literally thinks everyone is out to sexually assault him (and somehow they seem to), he solves his problems by throwing money at it, instead of any actual creativity, and the author desperately tries to portray him as a mature-for-his-age adult, despite the fact that his first reaction to anything is crying followed by petty revenge.

I'm just flicking through the pages, pausing at any plot bits, and then flicking on.

(page 2) 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] BottleOfAlkahest@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The name of the rose. The movies...fine, I guess. The books at least 300 pages too long and frequently segues into long-winded discussion of the political minutiae of the warring monastic orders during the reign of Pope John XXII.

If you want to read about the time period you'll be annoyed by the murder mystery shoehorned into your dry long winded historical fiction. If you wanted a murder mystery set in a historical setting then you'll be annoyed by the history lesson being shoved down your throat like a dehydrated fig newton.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

My partner hateread Where The Crawdads Sing, but we haven’t seen the film, so probably that.

[–] Gur814@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I haven’t read the book but enjoyed the movie. 🤷

[–] plumcreek@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago

I found the movie a bit sappy. A weaker version of To Kill a Mockingbird. What I couldn't get over was the nonsensical geography and impossibly frequent bus service.

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Hunt for Red October though film wasn't bad at all, but the book was mediocre, boring and offputting.

[–] BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago

maybe shrek? i never cared for the book though its not bad

[–] ulkesh@beehaw.org 2 points 6 months ago

My spouse says "Stardust" the book is nowhere near as good as "Stardust" the movie. We both love the movie, but it's surprising the book wasn't nearly as good.

load more comments