this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
392 points (95.6% liked)

Programming

17319 readers
86 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Initially, LinkedIn was just another site where you could find jobs. It was simple to use, simple to connect with others; it even had some friendly groups with meaningful discussions.

And then it gained monopoly as the "sole" professional network where you could actually land a job. If you are not on LinkedIn now, you are quite invisible in the job market. Recruiters are concentrated there, even if they have to pay extremely high prices for premium accounts. The site is horrible now: a social network in disguise, toxic and boring influencers, and a lot of noise and bloated interface to explore.

When Google decided to close their code.google.com, GitHub filled a void. It was a simple site powered by git (not by svn or CVS), and most of the major open-source projects migrated there. The interface was simple, and everything was perfect. And then something changed.

GitHub UI started to bloat, all kinds of "features" nobody asked for were implemented, and then the site became a SaaS. Now Microsoft hosts the bulk of open-source projects the world has to offer. GitHub has become a monopoly. If you don't keep your code there, chances are people won't notice your side projects. This bothers me.

Rant over. I hate internet monopolies.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] herescunty@lemmy.world 162 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

“Show us your GitHub”

Sure, here it is

“Looks empty”

Ya, I code for work, it’s all in private repos or in Azure Devops.

“So you don’t contribute to open source in your free time?”

No, I spend free time with my family. Again, I code for work, why on earth would I also use my free time for extra coding

“Thanks for your time but…”

Nah thanks for yours, I don’t wanna work for a company that expects me to code for them for for 8 hours and then go and code for someone else for free for more hours. That’s not a healthy work life balance, dickhead.

Edit: well this blew up (in a small lemmy kinda way). To clarify, before I coded for a living I coded as a hobby. Since I now do it full time, I don’t have any itch to scratch, I get my fill 40 hours a week. I’d ONLY be contributing to keep my GitHub looking a certain way for recruiters that one year in five I’m jobseeking and that feels like a waste of time. In reality it’ll probably be dark green the week before I started interviewing when I updated my website and then nothing before that until the last time I was interviewing.

Also, I chose to have a family and that takes effort, time and precedence over hobbies for me. If you also made that choice and you can code full time, have a healthy relationship with your wife and kids and still find time to have hobby code projects, all power to you. I don’t have the energy to open the laptop back up and get into something by the time the kids are in bed and I’ve spent some time with the wife. I’m not staying up into the night so a recruiter can glance at a chart and judge me to be a good or bad dev by how green it is.

How do I improve my skills over time? Tbh if the company I’m working for doesn’t allow me to block out a couple of hours to half day a week for learning I’m at the wrong company. I read, follow along with tutorials, experiment and think about how what I’m learning could be applied to the product I work with. Then if an opportunity to apply it comes along, I take it and either fail fast or bring something new, of value to the table.

Yup, the chart still goes green with contributions to private company repos, but those contributions also ain’t from my personal GitHub account, they’re from the one linked to my work email and I imagine they’ll close that account pretty quickly when I leave. Idk how that works tho, I only worked in one team in my whole dev career that seriously uses GitHub as source control, and they’re being moved to ADO as we type. GitHub is the go to for FOSS, but I don’t work in FOSS, I work in enterprise software and there’s much better enterprise git providers than GitHub (imho, ymmv). You can even throw the question back “do you actually use github here? If so can you tell me what lead you to go with that instead of other source control providers?” or side step it “I don’t really use github but I’m experienced in Azure DevOps and Team Foundation Server plus I’m fluent in git command line so I’ll be able to skill up in GitHub specifics pretty quickly if I need to”. Interviews are two way streets, I’m interviewing a company as much as they’re interviewing me, I have standards on where I’ll choose to work.

If you want a portfolio, I’ve got one, it’s on my website, the url of which is on my cv. Knock yourself out, sign up if you like, it’s public. I even updated it just for you last week.

Y’know why recruiters ask to see your github? Because they read in a book or a blog somewhere that that’s what they should ask when interviewing developers. 21 year old graduate developers looking for their first junior position, sure, maybe. That isn’t all devs tho.

[–] quantum_mechanic@lemmy.world 67 points 1 year ago (9 children)

I'd love to see recruiters who recruit in their free time, or surgeons who perform surgery in their free time.

[–] sundrei@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

...or surgeons who perform surgery in their free time.

I suspect surgeons doing surgery in their off hours wouldn't be just weird, but also very creepy.

[–] quantum_mechanic@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I suppose this happens already, with there being a black market for human organs after all.

[–] ndotb@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago

I can think of surgeon examples but I've never heard of Recruiters Without Borders. Unless it's just CapGemini

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Aziz-Rahmad645@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Well, some people regard coding as a hobby...

[–] REdOG@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Sysadmining is a lifestyle

[–] aaulia@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

But not expected, and they may have selfhosted repo at home.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sip@programming.dev 18 points 1 year ago

I get where you come from. I don't code after work much, but if nobody did, there wouldn't be much OSS. As for that interviewer, he's a dickhead.

[–] ndotb@programming.dev 10 points 1 year ago

Fintech is easy to deal with in this regard.

"do you have code samples you can share?"

"would you be happy if an employee interviewed elsewhere and used your codebase for work samples?"

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] raubarno@lemmy.ml 51 points 1 year ago (8 children)

At least, there's Codeberg, run by a German nonprofit, who's challenging the monopoly. It is aimed exclusively for FOSS projects, private repositories are forbidden. They are running Forgejo as their bloat-free software forge server.

Now, I think every Web2 website must be operated by a nonprofit.

[–] Laxaria@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

From my PoV it's probably many of these projects are effectively public good spaces. Hosting a code repository has become less of an esoteric thing and turning into a public good benefit (like a physical library but virtual for code). Spaces like Reddit and Twitter are todays analogous of a public discussion forum in a park or at a bar.

Internet tools have become so ubiquitous they are critical to serve public needs and public benefits. However these internet spaces are increasingly commercialized and privatized, which runs against them being valuable public goods (see the difference between Wikipedia, run primarily for public benefit, and Wikia/Fandom).

[–] AnonymousLlama@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Overall codeberg has been pretty decent, it's where the Kbin project is located. There's been a few outages over the last few weeks but overall it's pretty good.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] spartanatreyu@programming.dev 47 points 1 year ago

Github has always had being a job site be it's secondary feature.

Except that it has a slightly higher bar of entry to recruiters and recruitment bots spreading toxic positivity, and anyone asking for a job is able to prove (at least some of) their value by showing off their code and how they participate publically in other repos (if at all).

[–] sirdorius@programming.dev 45 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I see two points in your argument:

Everything becoming a social network

People working at tech companies have to justify their salary somehow and this is low hanging fruit for adding 'features' as all people feel some need for connection. Feeling that a place is alive with other people will motivate your more to engage with it, rather than say, your own Git hosted server. I don't mind the social features added to GitHub as long as they don't take the main stage, like it did in the LinkedIn transformation.

GitHub monopoly of open source

GitHub has for most of the time been the main place for open source. I don't see a monopoly as necessarily bad as long as it remains focused on some values other than profit. I would rather have one big Wikipedia than a shitload of small fractured Wikipedias. Can it become a problem going forward, like it did with Reddit? Definitely, but I am cautiously optimistic. And in the worst case, git is heavily decentralized by design so you're one git remote add && git push away from moving. Migrating issues would be a bit more of a hassle, but surely there are solutions. And CI is not easily portable, but not a huge amount of work to convert to other formats.

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Codeberg can automatically migrate code and issues from Github using a personal access token iirc.

Github packages and especially CI/CD are the real vendor locking antifeatures. All of the actions and scripts that your app/company depends on to run are completely locked to github.

[–] gamma@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago

Fwiw, gitea has compatible actions. Not sure how compatible, though.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] heartlessevil@lemmy.one 30 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Bro that occurred years ago. Github and linkedin are both owned by Microsoft. It is a funnel from LinkedIn recruitment requiring Github requirements from the recruiters. Unfortunately nobody who is under 30 years old saw these dumb tools getting ripped off.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] StudioLE@programming.dev 29 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Has GitHub actually done anything negative? Your comments really just sound like fear mongering, I can't see any actual issues.

What is the bloat you're referring to? The UI is clean and simple. Navigating and searching code is intuitive. The issue tracker is basic but reliable. Releases are clear. GitHub Actions are complex but featureful and incredibly useful. GitHub Packages are basic but useful. GitHub Copilot is damn impressive.

[–] triarius@programming.dev 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

They scanned open source repos and made an LLM out of it. Now companies can profit from open source code without contributing back to the ecosystem. The only contribution they make is the money they pay to Microsoft for Copilot. So Microsoft is profiting from OSS code and stifling its community.

Does this outweigh the free hosting of the code? IDK

[–] CoderKat@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Now companies can profit from open source code without contributing back to the ecosystem.

They could literally always do that. Unless they changed the software, most open source licenses required nothing but maybe a mention of attribution (which no one will ever read). And some don't even require that. They could also always use FOSS tools to develop software without contributing anything back. How is Copilot different from that?

And honestly, Copilot is pretty amazing for devs. Why would I care that Microsoft profits off it when it benefits us too? While I love FOSS and all else equal would choose it every time, it's unreasonable to expect everything to be free and open source. People have to make a living somehow and open source rarely pays the bills.

I'm not sure how Microsoft is stifling the community either. They seem to have been running GitHub great and they've made a lot of great dev tools in recent years. I used to absolutely loath Microsoft, but these days they're mostly alright in my book (at least from a developer PoV). Stuff like how they've handled GitHub, creation of WSL, VS Code, etc have all been great.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] philm@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago

I agree with the other comment. It's Open source after all, they could've just crawled the web otherwise.

Private repos on the other hand is a different story.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] firelizzard@programming.dev 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

monopoly: the exclusive possession or control of the supply of or trade in a commodity or service.

GitHub is not a monopoly: it has competition. If you're upset about it's market share, switch to GitLab, Bitbucket, or host your own instance. If you're upset about people not being aware of the other options, be an advocate and spread awareness of the alternatives.

[–] zlatko@programming.dev 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's not a monopoly, but it's still an oversized influence on the market. I think the poster is arguing that: when have you heard a recruiter ask you for your bitbucket account? But they will look at github.

[–] hellishharlot@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If they ask for a GitHub but you have a bitbucket send them the repo link to your bitbucket...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] philm@programming.dev 24 points 1 year ago

I'm very split between Github (currently) providing a really nice interface/collection/way to access all kinds of open source projects and the obvious 'out-of-control centralisation' by the mega corp Microsoft.

It definitely got a little bit bloated the last years, but I still think it has a generally nice interface (browse code/review stuff, simple issue/PR system, simple way for CI via actions etc.).

But I really hope something like https://forgefed.org/ takes off someday, I feel like if the barriers are much lower to get onto a different network with the same user (without registering etc.) decentralisation can lead to more innovation in this space (management of all the stuff that Git doesn't manage itself, like issues, PRs etc.).

The beauty of Git though is that it's decentralized, so you can just mirror it on Github while mainly using a different platform. If you want a bigger userbase interacting/contributing with your project you'll allow PRs and issues there and if not just add a link to the README that points to the platform you're using...

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No, I don't see how GitHub it turning into LinkedIn. Everything you said are definitely new things GitHub is doing but none of them are things LinkedIn does. LinkedIn is pretty much just Facebook with career applications built-in.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Auzy@beehaw.org 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly, as others have mentioned, I don't agree its bloated. If anything, its actually missing a few features (like the ability to bulk change many repos with the same issue tags). Also, I like some of the new updates that are being released.

It doesn't run slowly in ANY way.

Furthermore, Sourceforge used to be the monopoly, and honestly, that was FAR more bloated. Projects will be found on any site, if its interesting. I don't remember ever searching for projects explicitly using Github search (I only use Google). A good project will show up anywhere.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Blackthorn@programming.dev 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wouldn't say it's a new LinkedIn, but it's definitely a defacto monopolio. It pains be that Cargo (the official rust packaging system) is so integrated with it. My own personal hobby projects are self-hosted on a gittea instance right now, but I still have a github account to contribute to a friend of mine's project which is, sadly, hosted there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nyander@beehaw.org 13 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I just host my own instance of Gitea.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] subway@lemmy.fmhy.ml 13 points 1 year ago

I was pressured into creating a profile in Linkedin and publish whatever shitty codes I could get on just so I could apply for interviews (which never got past round one). It's funny, because I got my first (and current) job in programming through connections made well before getting into IT.

My github profile is sitting there. Linkedin also sends me regular spams about how $user I never heard of posted some stuff I won't be interested in. Sure, I could actually use my Github as repository for coding outside work hours, it has its uses. But Linkedin? The place where cocksuckers gather to suck even more cocks from suits?

[–] CondeMg@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Hi! I am new to the programming world, and everything involved. What do you think about gitlab? Many people are using it instead Github. Also I heard about Codeberg, but I dont know anything about it :)

[–] rist097@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Advantage of Github over Gitlab is code discoverability. My organization hosts Gitlab instance but I would still rather host my open source project on Github instead, because its impossible to collaborate on Gitlab with external users who dont have an account on our instance.

Once there is a federation feature similar to Lemmy, I would be happy to host everything there.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Slotos@feddit.nl 6 points 1 year ago

https://sr.ht/

Gitlab adheres to a “one tool for all the jobs” philosophy and tends to be a performance mess for the end user. Every time I had to use it, I wanted not to.

SourceHut is a counterexample to claims of monolith superiority gitlab makes. Whether it will continue to be that is an open question, but right now it’s quite a joy to use.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] digdilem@feddit.uk 9 points 1 year ago

Same has happened in recent versions of Gitlab. Lots of feature creep and UI changes that seem non-intuitive (at least for me)

[–] toasteranimation@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›