this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2024
593 points (96.4% liked)

politics

19126 readers
2412 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Edit: There's a lot of people in the comment section who clearly didn't read the article so let me clarify that no, this is not about Judge Aileen Cannon. Read. The. Damn. Article.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

Any of his idiot base that think it's worthwhile to have a....checks notes....civil war over this stupid buffoon deserve the inevitable outcome.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Let's get on with it! I'm still waiting for the AR-15 waving morons on mobility scooters getting mowed down.

[–] KnightontheSun@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

the AR-15 waving morons on mobility scooters

Oh, the Chairborne Rangers? Or is it Meal Team Six? Or the Gravy Seals? Of course, we also know the Talibangelicals, Walmartyrs, the Yeehawdists and the Oaf Keepers. But there are also the Q Cucks Clan, Cupcake Commandos, Vanilla Isis and Midlife Isis, but don't forget the Green Beignets, Waffle SS, 1st Chairborne, KFC-9, Special Farces and Snack Ops.

As you can see, they are a very diverse [all-white] group of [seriously hungry] patriots!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] superfes@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago (6 children)

Just what we need... another civil war... bleh.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Shouldn't come as a surprise really. They have even set a date for April the 12th

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_War_(film)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

There will be no "civil war" until republicans win again.

Cops are gonna cop either way (so do nothing other than find the nearest brown kid they can beat on until The Public gets mad enough that they have to act). Even a bunch of untrained gravy seals with ar-15s are going to leave the cops shitting themselves and crying while they play gacha games on their phones. It is the military (mostly National Guard) who are going to matter.

And Jan 6 already showed how that plays out. They are going to do whatever they are ordered to. So if the POTUS is actively trying to murder the VPOTUS and the president pro tem and so forth? Doesn't matter because the person they report to is telling them to not act or, after seeing Jan 6 "fail", to impose martial law to protect the country. Just.. not over there. We got some uppity negros what need putting down first.

If anyone who actually cares about the country is in power (so... Democrats and a very small subset of third parties)? We roll up on the gravy seals with a few drones that drop tear gas and we are done. If it is the republicans? It won't be a "civil war" so much as a series of lynchings.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The problem is that we're approaching politics like sports. We root for our team, and boo the other side relentlessly. Government, though, is not a zero-sum game. We don't automatically win when the other side loses, and sometimes we all lose.

The confusion with the Cannon case in this thread is apt, actually. Because we all do the same stuff. We just think we have facts in our side. I've openly wondered whether Cannon has a new RV in her driveway, after reading some of her rulings. All the shit that the MAGAs are saying about the other judges, we are saying about Cannon. We can't both be right.

This is the real civil war here. It won't be Sherman carving a path to the sea. But it will be two sides with such different ideas about what is true that "patriots" will take it upon themselves to conduct asymmetrical warfare. i think it will look more like Belfast in the 1970's than Atlanta in the 1860's.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

One random guy on Twitter "there will be a civil war!"

Raw Story: "THE REPUBLICANS ARE THREATENING CIVIL WAR!"

I guess "random Twitter account spouts bullshit" isn't as compelling a headline.

[–] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

Well, it wouldn't be too difficult to defeat a gullible and unstable army

[–] suction@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

Bring it on, fatties!

[–] Mastengwe@lemm.ee 7 points 7 months ago

Sounds a lot like a threat to me.

[–] Bipta@kbin.social 7 points 7 months ago

Commenter Michale Darwin wrote, "Look at the judge's body language. Anyone can see that that judge hates Trump's guts. Or that judge has taken some sort of a bribe,"

They are so fucking delusional.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

Cannon is one of the FLORIDA judges. Not GEORGIA.

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 6 points 7 months ago

“tHerE wiLL bE a ciViL wAr…”

Sure Jan

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 months ago

Cool bros, you'll lose.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›