this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
362 points (95.7% liked)

politics

19104 readers
3317 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 7 months ago

What about making assholes responsible for inciting terror and violence and kicking them out of office? There's a responsibility coming with the job, and he's not fit to meet the entry level.

[–] Rottcodd@kbin.social 3 points 7 months ago

Ten bucks says he has snuff porn on his D drive...

[–] ToAllPointsWest@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

The tragedy here is that supporting genocide isn't a criminal offense. Censure at a minimum, but he really needs significant legal consequences

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

No narcissism epidemic in America. Nope. Not at all.

[–] Skua@kbin.social 2 points 7 months ago

holden_bloodfeast.png

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Well, both sides still look the same to me...

Edit: y'all sarcasm detectors clearly need calibrating.

[–] Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I get what you're saying.

However, the time to effect change while suffering a first past the post voting system is between elections, campaigning for electoral reform in your state.

Switching away from first past the post voting allows people to vote for who represents them best while still counting their vote against those they dont want to win. Just search for videos on FPTP voting if you want an explanation on why the spoiler effect exists, and how that makes third parties not viable.

Electoral reform is possible in each individual state (for now), we dont need federal reform! Maine and Alaska have already passed electoral reform.

So what’s the hold up with the rest of the states? Consider starring a campaign to change how we vote in your own state! Force our representatives to compete with fresh outside ideas. We deserve the best representation, not excuses.

Who could possibly say no to more democracy?

[–] halferect@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

I think it's because on lemmy a large portion of active people are saying those things non sarcastically so my initial reaction was OK another one of these chuckle heads who scream genocide Joe and both sides! You have to put a /s because that's the world we live in now

[–] foggy@lemmy.world -3 points 7 months ago

Yo fuck the world rn.

No o e is good. I mean there's a clearly less evil side but that side is clearly evil as fuck

Guillotines are easy to make.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›