this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2024
31 points (89.7% liked)

Videos

14311 readers
308 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Don't be a jerk
  4. No advertising
  5. No political videos, post those to !politicalvideos@lemmy.world instead.
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
  7. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
  8. Duplicate posts may be removed

Note: bans may apply to both !videos@lemmy.world and !politicalvideos@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

While it's an excellent video, as Petter's always are, what he really wants to talk about and is the new thing that gives us a better idea of where it hit the water, is this: https://www.airlineratings.com/news/mh370-update-new-report-proves-wsprnet-tracking-over-long-distance/

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago

Wow, that is really interesting. Now I'm going down the WSPR rabbit hole... Thanks

[–] Dehydrated@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

He makes such great content, I always get excited when he uploads a new video.

I also think Green Dot Aviation's video about MH370 is worth checking out.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

He makes a good video. But it's more fictional than anything else. He creates a scenario that's possible with the data, but he doesn't make it clear what is speculation versus data. The whole scenario with the first officer banging on the door, there's no data for any of that. It's a plausible scenario... Sure

[–] Dehydrated@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

True, some parts are made up (very plausible though) because there's no information on them

[–] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Okay so assuming that the data presented is more or less correct. It seems like there would have had to have been an experienced triple 7 pilot at the controls the whole time. The video seems to imply that the captain was the only one who could have done this.

What do people think is that an overreach of the video or not?

[–] labsin@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

Maybe it could also have been the first officer if he prepared really well? There seems to be a lot of evidence confirming a well planned route with all communication disabled.

Anyway, it clearly looks like it is a suicide that he tried to mask as an accident. It's the worst way to go, taking all these casualties. It wouldn't be the first one, but definitely the best covered up so far.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Why the figure 8 at the end?

[–] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

It was quite possible to make sure there was zero fuel onboard. Fuel will float and make a large slick that could be spotted from the air. Assuming part of this was to make sure that it would be as difficult as possible to find. This would be in line.

[–] labsin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

Maybe waiting for the pane to go down while it's out of range of any possible radar? It seems to be in the middle of the ocean and maybe that was where he planned to more or less run out of fuel 🤷‍♂️

[–] Synthuir@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

My mouth was agape when he revealed the figure-8…

He hypothesized in the video that the figure-8 was to check to make sure no ships were in the area to further decrease risk of detection. Personally, I think it’s not unreasonable to assume it was just a final joyride into the abyss.

[–] ButtCheekOnAStick@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Who lives in a pineapple under the sea? MALAYSIAN AIRLINES MH370!