this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
71 points (100.0% liked)

worldnews

1821 readers
1 users here now

Welcome! This community is constantly upgrading and is a current work in progress. Please stay tuned.

/c/Worldnews@sh.itjust.works strives for high-quality standards on the latest world events.

The basis of these standards comes from the MBFC, which uses an aggregate of methodologies, including the IFCN and World Freedom Indices, to rate the Bias and Factual Reporting of News.

These are non-profit organisations with full transparency of their funding and structure. Likewise, this community is also transparent – Please feel free to question its staff and the overall content of this community.


Does your post fit the standards? Check this thread!



Rules:


Disallowed submissions

Commenters will receive one public warning with only one strike if violating any of the following rules:

Thank you.

todo list:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Johnson & Johnson has sued four doctors who published studies citing links between talc-based personal care products and cancer, escalating an attack on scientific studies that the company alleges are inaccurate.

J&J's subsidiary LTL Management, which absorbed the company's talc liability in a controversial 2021 spinoff, last week filed a lawsuit in New Jersey federal court asking it to force three researchers to "retract and/or issue a correction" of a study that said asbestos-contaminated consumer talc products sometimes caused patients to develop mesothelioma.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Hopefully the judge doesn’t just toss the suit, but sanctions J&J for this. Fuck everything about this suit.

[–] Moyer1666@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What? Asbestos is well known to cause mesothelioma. What the hell is this suit based on other than bullshit?

[–] zzzzz@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

True, but ...

One particular issue with commercial use of talc is its frequent co-location in underground deposits with asbestos ore. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talc

[–] S_204@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

Streisand effect comes to mind here.

They're not putting this toothpaste back in the tube, so maybe start designing a better tube you numbnuts.

[–] WheeGeetheCat@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

Truly disgusting conduct from J & J.

It really seems like a fishing expedition as they are claiming that 'some or all' of the patients in the studies were 'exposed to asbestos from other sources' (instead of J&J? in addition to J&J? its not clear) - but then they are asking the patients identities be disclosed - so how could they know that?

They want to attack and harass and discredit the patients themselves now.

[–] PinkPanther@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

J&J is trying to sue facts. If they win, it'd set a precedent for other companies to sue and win with their own truth. Fuck J&J up their stupid asses.