this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024
276 points (96.9% liked)

politics

19082 readers
4775 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 50 points 7 months ago (55 children)

This is the first move of a coordinated effort it seems to me.

load more comments (55 replies)
[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 30 points 7 months ago (1 children)

In the same way that Jeffrey Dahmer "lost his way." I mean, in some sense it's true I guess, but...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

Wish we could get the young people who actually want to work together, and put them in power. Instead of these rich old men who don't care about their people or what the next generations want

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'll translate for those that don't speak liberal-ese:

"The ritual slaughter of Palestinians by Israel we have supported and enabled for decades is now becoming so intense that, to our complete surprise, it's ended up making us look bad to our voting fodder and now we have to do the bare minimum to not look like the imperialist white supremacist monstrosities we really are and always have been."

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

sends Israel more bombs

[–] cyd@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

White House is still pussyfooting around, though. From another article (FT):

John Kirby, spokesperson for the US National Security Council, said Schumer had told the White House in advance what he was planning to say. But he sought to distance the White House from the Senate majority leader’s comments, saying that the Biden administration remained “focused on making sure that Israel has what it needs to defend itself, while doing everything that they can to avoid civilian casualties”.

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

I think someone like Schumer can afford to throw a punch while Biden sees how it lands and waits to throw another. Biden may wait until he’s sure Bibi is finished.

[–] gastationsushi@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

And some people want to put all the GOP craziness on one ex-president.

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Congratulations Bibi, you're next up in the long standing tradition of scapegoating. We know the next guys not gonna be much better and the problem with Israel are deep a systemic, but it'll at least force a new media cycle where Isreal will have less eyes on it. Horray.

[–] Vash63@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Bibi has been a large part of that system for a long time. He's not just a scapegoat.

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

He's being pressured out so the US doesn't have to stop funneling money to their interest keepers in the middle east and he's far from the only one in the government wishing vile things upon both Gaza and the West Bank. This is a band aid on a bullet hole.

[–] GeneralVincent@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

If he's the only person that sees any consequences for the tens of thousands of civilians killed, then imo he's essentially a scapegoat.

load more comments
view more: next ›