this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
173 points (98.3% liked)

Work Reform

9955 readers
959 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

“This ‘groundbreaking’ AI proposal that they gave us yesterday, they proposed that our background performers should be able to be scanned, get one day’s pay, and their companies should own that scan, their image, their likeness and should be able to use it for the rest of eternity on any project they want, with no consent and no compensation. So if you think that’s a groundbreaking proposal, I suggest you think again.”

all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Camzing@lemmy.world 73 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Their scanned image should be under copyright to the person 70 years after death, the same that they demand.

[–] teft@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

With payable royalties.

[–] swnt@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

Such a sweet response!

[–] NVariable@startrek.website 62 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The 1% really believe AI is their golden ticket to get rid of all of us. They’re going after professions with strong unions first and publicly, so that they can try to poison us all against collective bargaining, which is our only chance against them.

[–] Acetanilide@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

I wish I could double boost this

[–] IDatedSuccubi@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I mean, videogames already have contracts specifically designed for that. Contracts like these always have limitations to time, amount of products released, restrictions on surrounding themes, etc, and, of close, closure terms. They have shit ton of detail in them, and are studied by studios very carefuly. These actors have their own agents and lawyers that really know how to do their job. Ain't nobody letting them use their face for "eternity".

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

They're doing it to extras that are desperate... People that will do pretty much anything to get on screen, let alone say a line.

But like 99% of today's stars did that work before becoming stars.

If someone signs this "deal" and then gets famous a decade later, they stop getting paid and studios just use their digital likeness.

[–] Ragnell@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

Ain’t nobody letting them use their face for “eternity”.

Hence the strike.

[–] SamsonSeinfelder@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

That was true in the beginning, yes. But now that this topic is not any more a special thing for some game or movie but developing into the modus operandi, media companies start to crack down on those rules and try to alter the deals with as much force as possible to gain an advantage. The strike of the SAG right now is only the beginning of reactions to these new developments of maximizing profits by taking advantage of uneven bargaining power.

[–] randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

Has anyone else seen the movie "The Congress" starring Robin Wright?