Even among universities where it's in the same school, the way it's taught varies. As a guy who hires a lot of CS folks, my impression is that when it's in a college of engineering they tend to focus a little more on the process of developing code (requirements, design, and test, not just the coding part), and when it's in a college of science, there's a bit more theory. But the that's not necessarily true at every university. I actually prefer it when folks have had more of the process part (it's even sometimes a Software Engineering degree).

I went to a school in Michigan for Comp Sci in college of engineering. The curriculum was in my opinion poorly organized. I had to take a lot of english, physics and math prereqs while taking intro programming classes. With my ADHD, i failed to apply myself to these classes adequately. I ended up programming personal projects when I should have been studying (so glad I'm medicated now). By the time I was taking courses that interested me, my GPA was garbage and I was burnt out.

From people I know at another Michigan school, which had Comp Sci in college of science, courses were immediately engaging and relevant. This anecdote has a sample size of n=2 so take it with a grain of salt. These may not be related variables at all.

Engineering college or Science college. Some say it's a Math.

It is all 3 lol. Computer is a product of engineering, it is science bc you can program on computer to verify the prediction of a computational theory, it is also maths bc automata is mathematical construct.

Have a look at the degree requirements, you can see what looks more interesting: http://catalog.csulb.edu/preview_program.php?catoid=8&poid=3752&hl=%22computer+science+%22&returnto=search

https://catalog.cpp.edu/preview_program.php?catoid=36&poid=9570

Funny they both use the same catalog software