this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2024
85 points (86.3% liked)

politics

19097 readers
5523 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] chetradley@lemmy.world 51 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This article is giving me 2016 "don't worry about it" vibes.

[–] KnightontheSun@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

You aren't even allowed to wrap fish with it any more!

[–] MasterNerd@lemm.ee 20 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Why the fuck is the map made of hexagons?

[–] neptune@dmv.social 8 points 8 months ago

Zoom in, and cannot even read the state abbreviations

[–] CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee 8 points 8 months ago

It's actually a decent way of showing "land doesn't vote" when the states have equal representation (like US senate).

For electoral votes, you start with this but then make them larger per total count. Greatly corrects the "USA is 90% red!!!" that you get if you just color the states as-is.

[–] Usually_Lurker@fedia.io 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)
[–] chetradley@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I've never seen someone HTML tag their comment before.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 8 points 8 months ago

It was fairly common ~15 years ago

[–] NotAtWork@startrek.website 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

people used to do it all the time, but as it was passed around it degraded now all you get is "/s"

[–] aniki@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago

<marquee> Damn youngins!

[–] bostonbananarama@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

The map below shows the states...

No, it very much does not!

[–] qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one 9 points 8 months ago (5 children)

WTF is an anti-Donald Trump vote?

[–] aniki@lemm.ee 12 points 8 months ago
[–] Steve@startrek.website 11 points 8 months ago

Everyone voting for Biden, wishing they had a younger, better candidate, but at least its not Donald Motherfucking Trump.

[–] distantsounds@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Everyone who is forced to vote Biden because they don’t want Trump again would fall under that category. I believe it’s a substantial portion of the US population.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

People who vote for Biden but resent having to.

[–] ChowJeeBai@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Doesn't matter if they don't go out and vote.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The former president increased his number of delegates to 995 on Tuesday, according to the latest update from the Associated Press, after 15 states and one territory voted in Republican primaries across the country.

With a candidate needing 1,215 delegates to secure the nomination, the votes were a resounding success for Trump, and reaffirmed expectations that he will run against the Democratic incumbent Joe Biden in November's presidential election.

But Haley, the former South Carolina governor who was Trump's remaining rival in the GOP primary race before she announced she was quitting, performed moderately well in a number of states, showing that Republican support for the former president is not unanimous.

Speaking on Fox News, former George W. Bush adviser Karl Rove raised concerns about Republican Party unity.

"There's still some work to be done to unify the Republican Party and that's going to depend a lot on his tone tonight and whether or not he stops doing things like calling [Haley] 'Bird Brain' and threatening that if you give money to her campaign you're going to be permanently banned.

Scott Lucas, a professor in International Politics at University College Dublin, told Newsweek the Republican Party is very divided and Haley and her supporters may not switch their allegiance to Trump.


The original article contains 488 words, the summary contains 211 words. Saved 57%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago