ObsidianMD

Great insight! This is one of those real "a-ha" moments that keeps me using Obsidian today.

One concept that backlinking and a bottom-up note structure gave me insight on was actually this exact concept of "emergence." The idea that out of a large amount of chaos, order and structure can naturally form. I've been able to connect it to everything from philosophy to mental health to natural language and it's very exciting.

I am a person with late diagnosed ADHD/autism so my life breeds chaos. The assurance that you can just write without having to worry about where the note goes is so powerful.

Nicole van der Hoeven is a great resource! If you're looking for more YouTubers, I would recommend Artem Kirsanov. He has a couple of videos on bottom-up note taking/zettelkasten, but also has some really interesting conceptual videos on how people learn and retain knowledge. He's a computational neuroscience student but he's great at being interesting and not overly dry about his explanations. My primary Obsidian resource on YouTube is Bryan Jenks. I've basically stolen most of his setup because he also has the same pain points I do (namely having terrible working memory and issues starting tasks).

Good luck and thanks for the post!

One of the important feature of obsidian for me - futureprove. if obsidian dissaperead all my notes are mostly as usable without it as with it.

Using Dataview to organize and link your notes you lose this feature. This is probably ok for you, but I do not like this.

I did try to not use folders, but could not. Somehow, my mental structure works that way. Still, I think it depends on how you use them. I just have a handful of very high level folders for the big parts of my life I usually compartimentalize anyway, but it is flat otherwise, no subcategories,etc. Semantic connections across those folders, when the need arises, are done with links and tags. I use dataview sparingly. To me, the most attractive feature of Obsidian is the fact that, at the end of the day, all the notes are plain markdown files. Having used different note taking apps for decades now (I have notes from the late 90s still around, which I kept migrating from tool to tool), to be stuck in a proprietary format (or requiring special rendering, as is the case) would be a showstopper.

Still, the most beautiful thing about Obsidian, I think, is it’s ability to support a myriad organization styles, matching different people’s cognitive styles!

I started my wiki in TiddlyWiki, which by default means links and search were the only way to find notes. When I moved to Obsidian, I tried sorting everything into PARA-style folders, but… it’s way too much maintenance to mess about sorting everything so I’ve quit caring. I operate exclusively through links and search.

Everything is still in the folders but going back to a mostly-flat folder structure is on my to-do list. Since I’m already not using them to navigate my notes, though, I’m not in too big a hurry.

I went through multiple steps of using and not using folders. In the end a had a moment where I asked myself a question. What is a page? What should it contain and how big it should be? Then it struck me and more questions popped up. Why do I need one way of linking when I link a page, but different way when I want to link a specific part? The answer is that I don’t need Obsidian. I need an outliner. An infinite fractal document which enables me to link specific parts of its tree. So I switched to Tana and then to Workflowy.

My method of organizing “pages” is quite simple. I use alphabet. It’s surprising to me that I don’t see it being recommended as a default option online. Instead I see Johnny Decimal, PARA, LATCH and other names just to sell an online course. Now what is a page in my system. It’s a search keyword and I associate with the information.

Next step that arises sooner than later is to reduce number of pages visible. I do this by progressively grouping pages into “folders” which in case of an outliner means nesting it under each other. For example I might discover a cool fact about Prague. I have a lot of pages that start with P so I group them. Then I notice that a lot pages start with Pr so I group them again and then I create Prague node.

Searching is simple as well. If I search for my friend John I might click through J > Jo > John but it is logical in my eyes and three levels are not that common anyway.

I have folders and even tho some individual notes might get forgotten over time the important ones are still reachable.
Also I have some tags which make search very easy.

Having all the notes in a sinlge long list is very annoying, it gets me frustrated trying to look for something, infinite scrolling is the worst.