this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
301 points (99.3% liked)

Android

17682 readers
3 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

πŸ”—Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


πŸ’‘Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

πŸ’¬Matrix Chat

πŸ’¬Telegram channels / chats

πŸ“°Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 49 points 1 year ago (1 children)

One less reason to use Google for search.

[–] lowleveldata@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Ya. Duckduckgo is ok and Brave search is great

[–] nix@merv.news 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I don’t understand why people recommend duckduckgo. Its not open source, still includes ads (sure they’re no as invasive), they’re a for profit company who will do who knows what with our data when the investors want to increase their profits, and the search results aren’t very good causing people to use the !g google shortcut anyways.

If anything people should recommend a searx instance that uses google and other engines so you still get the good search results and dont feed google your data

Well I dislike Google more

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Lazylazycat@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Google is unusable now. Google images is the worst.

[–] Gray@lemmy.ca 43 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Not being able to open image in new tab and download them anymore has made it functionally useless for me.

Firefox is still out there, and great! You don't have to be beholden to chrome's bullshit.

[–] Lazylazycat@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Yeah same, it's so hard to open or download a pic now, I actually opened bing earlier out of frustration D':

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is an extension for that, available on Firefox and Chrome. I couldn't use image search without it, to be honest.

You suck, Getty Images.

[–] Gray@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Omg, thank you so much for this - I had no idea!

[–] armrods@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's due to a lawsuit for copyrights... Google settled and made so users couldn't download the image from the Google app, they need to visit the site

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 10 points 1 year ago

Ok, but if I open the site and it's one of those automatically generated shit and the image is nowhere to be found...

[–] DrQuint@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

And then the site doesn't even have that image and a lot of websites are starting to do it on purpose. Therefore, the search has failed.

It's over, google images is a bad product.

[–] Ducks@ducks.dev 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Blame Getty Images for that one

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago

All my homies hate Getty. I'm still so pissed they bought Unsplash.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The enshittification is complete.

[–] Crudman@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

Been looking for this word, it's so perfectly succinct and evocative of the Web 3.0 sludgeworld.

Search engines are almost entirely useless now. As much as I'd love an indie alternative, sending out millions of webcrawlers seems prohibitively expensive.

[–] pgm_01@kbin.social 36 points 1 year ago

I love how Google's original intent of simply cataloging the net has now turned them into a net nanny whose job it is to prohibit vile copyright scofflaws from infesting others with their demented thinking.

[–] saba@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=newpipe -> top result is newpipe.net

The takedown request on google.com was submitted by Because Music : Home of Christine and the Queens, Manu Chao, Justice, Metronomy, Parcels, Ed Banger Records…

[–] inspector@gadgetro.id 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Home of Christine and the Queens, Manu Chao, Justice, Metronomy, Parcels, Ed Banger Records…

I've never heard of any of those artists...

[–] saba@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

neither have I, but it's who is listed on their website and perhaps who they're worried about people downloading via newpipe?

[–] inspector@gadgetro.id 2 points 1 year ago

If download is what they're worried about, they should also have a look at yt-dlp then. Something that Google themselves have tried blocking before, but gave in because a lot of folks had pretty genuine use cases for yt-dlp

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] onichama@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is it finally time to switch to DuckDuckGo?

[–] vividspecter@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Newpipe is still on Google for me, but I recommend DDG anyway because of its bangs support.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 22 points 1 year ago

This french copyright troll doesn't hold any rights on YouTube (the website) so the DMCA removal request is invalid

No content hosted on newpipe.net is owned by that copyright troll, nor there are instructions or links to pirate that exact content so I don't understand how it it can be considered valid. I should be rejected, together with all the subsequent requests

[–] Brownboy13@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Wow, this is such shit. The request itself is so overly broad, it's a shame that google chose (or was forced) to honor it. I see the following listed in the request:

10. addons.mozilla.org
15. www.microsoft.com
16. play.google.com
40. en.wikipedia.org
45. chrome.google.com
58. www.trustpilot
64. soundcloud.com
65. www.facebook.com

[–] Carter@feddit.uk 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I'm a YouTube Premium subscriber that uses NewPipe. If they kill it I'll be unsubbing.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] inverimus@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

Top result on Google is newpipe.net for me. Perhaps NewPipe has already submitted a counter notice and it has been restored? That's how the DMCA is supposed to work.

Definitely think this has been corrected because a search for "NewPipe" in an incognito window yields NewPipe.net as the first result with the Github, reddit, and F-Droid pages following.

[–] t0fr@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

Kind of surprised that Google didn't already remove it considering it is an application that circumvents it's own products But you know, it was bound to happen eventually

[–] kenderguy@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

I saw a Louis Rossmann video on this. Honestly, corporations don't even have to hide their intentions anymore. It's really sad that they can do shit plain in sight for everyone to see, but blind only to the legal system.

[–] Zucca@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Took longer than I thought.

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 4 points 1 year ago

If the DMCA was sent by YouTube, ok. But in this case it has been sent by a french copyright troll that has nothing to do with YouTube

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] AnonymousLlama@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

How's newpipe compared to sometime like revanced? Anyone given both a go?

[–] verysoft@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

With the newpipe sponsorblock fork, it's perfect. Simple and very functional. Supports more than just youtube too.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I like NewPipe, but honestly I prefer LibreTube + [Piped](https://piped video/).

[–] NatoBoram@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

NewPipe is better for playing a playlist in the background, ReVanced is better for active watching and browsing

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Depends on if you're looking for something like the official app or not.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KinkyMadman@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 year ago

Google search is dead for me, i have been using duck duck go for about 5 years now. If I'm searching for newpipe, I expect to get newpipe as a result. If I dont its utter wank at indenxing the internet.

[–] fne8w2ah@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Feckin' gobshite!

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί