this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
113 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

7185 readers
486 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Alberta intends to opt out of the proposed national pharmacare plan.

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] voluble@lemmy.ca 63 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Man, fuck these UCP idiots.

Provincial governments need to work closely with the federal government. The provincial government actually has a responsibility to establish and nurture that relationship, and not simply throw temper tantrums when the relationship isn't what they want it to be. When the UCP chooses to be oppositional and obstructive like this, it hurts Alberta citizens, and makes life worse.

There are a lot of things I love about Alberta. But if the next provincial election shows that a majority of the citizens truly want a provincial government that behaves like this, I'm outta here.

[–] plaguesandbacon@lemmy.ca 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Born and raised in Calgary, moved to Van Island about 3 years ago. Other than the Rockies and close friends, we don't miss AB at all

[–] Hootz@lemmy.ca 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

BC needs to somehow convince Alberta to give us the mountians. Maybe tell em it's full of liberals or something. Idk though might be hard to convince them to give up the good part of the province.

[–] yaygya@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] Hootz@lemmy.ca 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Sorry bro, the malls not cool enough anymore.

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago

Edmonton is cool. I'd be happy to have them.

[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 13 points 8 months ago

Man, fuck these UCP ~~idiots.~~ psychopathic sadists.

FTFY. They're not stupid, they know exactly what they're doing.

[–] tunetardis@lemmy.ca 53 points 8 months ago (2 children)

In an email to Global News on Sunday, Alberta’s health minister said that if the federal government pursues a national pharmacare program, Alberta intends to opt out, and instead intends to obtain a full per capita share of the funding.

So they can just pocket the money like that with no strings attached? wth

[–] Oderus@lemmy.world 32 points 8 months ago

This is the same government that thinks if they leave the CPP, they'll get 55% of the value that's in the CPP.

Clearly, math IS hard.

[–] pbjamm@beehaw.org 21 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I am sure their math will be just as poor for this as it was for the Pension Plan

[–] tunetardis@lemmy.ca 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah how's that going? (I don't live in Alberta.)

It seems to me this idea of opting out of federal programmes might score some quick political points if you're a have-province, in that it could be argued you're sinking more into them than you're getting out. But Alberta has historically had a boom-and-bust economy, and as such, cutting those federal lifelines seems unwise. But what do I know?

[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 12 points 8 months ago

I DO live in Alberta, and the general consensus is that (a) almost nobody wants to leave the CPP, but (b) Smith will make it happen, regardless of logic or the will of the people.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 49 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Why even allow provinces to opt out if it's a national plan?

[–] festus@lemmy.ca 19 points 8 months ago

Constitutionally, healthcare is a provincial responsibility so provinces have a lot of legal room to maneuver. That said the federal government is allowed to require single payer healthcare, so I'm wondering what's preventing them from giving Alberta the choice to use either a federal version or make their own, but not have nothing.

[–] archengel@nichenerdery.duckdns.org 38 points 8 months ago (3 children)
[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 48 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Because they voted for hucksters and openly anti-social, money-loving corporate sycophants.

They can't get along with the closeted anti-social, money-loving corporate sycophants.

[–] yaygya@lemmy.ca 7 points 8 months ago

Not all of us did.

[–] undercrust@lemmy.ca 19 points 8 months ago

It's truly a miserable fact of life that we somehow elected these childish buffoons that just can't help but say stupid things at every possible opportunity.

[–] Killer57@lemmy.ca 18 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Good old conservatives, best I can tell is they are against it because it covers contraceptives.

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 13 points 8 months ago

They're against it because the Liberal Federal government is proposing it.

[–] Sir_Osis_of_Liver@kbin.social 14 points 8 months ago

The feds could negotiate deals with the individual provinces. If your province opts in, they get federal assistance, if they don't they get bupkis.

There is no requirement for the feds to compensate provinces who choose not to sign on to programs.